Is This The Real Reason For Chicago’s Pension Obligation Bond Proposal? – Forbes

By pension actuary Elizabeth Bauer.
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NB-Chicago
7 years ago

wow-fantastic writing E Bauer!. does anybody out there in wp land know–do each union have to agree to have there discount rates changed? or cook up some actuarial report to allow it to happen?, i.e. does rahm go to each union pension behind closed doors and say hows about you agree to change your discount rate and in exchange I’ll push thru a gigantic $10B POB for ya all ,I’ll get reelected and the gravy train keeps a rollen. and who care if the tax payer & bond holder are screwed.

NB-Chicago
7 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

thanks, the pension trustees are not independent of the union leadership they’re mostly appointed by union leadership, correct? so backroom collusion/ cook the book deals go on

Nick T.
7 years ago

Looks like musical chairs on the Titanic. The city will be worse off after this when the fees for the offering are considered, which should be a minimum of $100 million (1%). Rahm’s buddies don’t offer discounts, maybe it would be 2%? Then they are putting $10 billion in the hands of who? Glad it’s not my money. Good luck Chicago people.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE