-- Connecting the dots between our economy, government and business --
So here ends the take of the approval of the Tier 2 pension system, with no actuarial review, no opportunity for anyone but the backroom negotiators to assess the changes before the vote was taken, and the need to take on faith the claim of $100 billion in savings. Is there anything in here that is a surprise? No. Is this sort of legislating unique to Illinois? Also no. But I think there’s still some value in observing our legislators in action.
With $162 billion more from taxpayers, couldn’t you deliver a few bond upgrades, too
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Everybody needs a side hustle these days, and mine is Ukraine, where I am now.
Summary and audio linked here.
SIGN UP HERE FOR OUR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER
Audio and summary
Wirepoints always, and I mean always, finds the best pictures. Where do you think Madigan put that finger?
Thanks, but that picture actually came with the Forbes article.
Would Tier 2 pass today? Doubtful. I’m still amazed at how vastly different Tier 2 is from Tier 1. Most states with two or more pension tiers didn’t make as large a change to multiple pension components as our Tier 2 did. Of course, the state’s pension clause is partly to blame for the severity of that change. No takebacks, so you takeaway a lot to start. I still subscribe to the belief that Tier 2 benefits will be greatly enhanced in the near future. The pension actuaries should be providing what-if analyses of multiple enhancement scenarios. Otherwise, every savings… Read more »