Opinion: Chicago’s Obama Center Is Under Water – Wall Street Journal

Richard Epstein and Michael Rachlis, of Protect our Parks: The Obama Foundation just released its annual report and 990 tax forms for 2021. Together they show that the Obama Presidential Center’s financial foundations are as rickety as its physical ones. The Foundation’s 2020 annual report exhibited some financial candor, estimating that $300 million in annual donations for four straight years would be necessary to meet all future construction and operating costs. The 2021 return revealed that the foundation had raised only $159 million, about 8% less than it raised in 2020.
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
P.T. Bombast
3 years ago

“inestimable value” means an incalculable worth — unless you have to pay for it. Let’s ask ourselves: If it burned to the ground would we rebuild it?

The Paraclete
3 years ago

The place looks like Azkaban or the MCC! It will evolve into an incomplete eye sore for Jackson Park. When will the arm twisting begin for funding? Any open or implicit reluctance to contribute will be considered racist!

nixit
3 years ago

Not surprising. All the momentum for this project was years ago right after Obama left office and Trump won. Every year that passes, Obama’s political influence wanes and leads to more indifference about the Obama era in general. It’s no longer the hip project to attach your name.

Obama knew this. That’s why the project was railroaded through. All the construction delays and fights with the Friends of the Parks (Obama acolytes, no less) have led to this moment.

Last edited 3 years ago by nixit
Chunky Puree
3 years ago

The plans to build the worlds largest outhouse are now changed. It will be a one-holer, gender neutral.

Old Joe
3 years ago
Reply to  Chunky Puree

Just don’t drop your wallet down there!

Rick
3 years ago

They should scrap the project and just sell Obama the Metropolitan Correction Center, I mean, it looks just like the Obama Center building plans.

GM
3 years ago
Reply to  Rick

Lol… you are spot – on…!!!

Old Joe
3 years ago

Hey I just thought up a brilliant idea. We can repurpose Soldier Field into the Obama Center.

There Lori, I fixed it for you at no charge.

Mary Ladd
3 years ago

Why haven’t Oprah, Beyonce, Bill Gates, Bezos, and all the other billionaires they pal around with helped to fund this “library”?

ron
3 years ago
Reply to  Mary Ladd

Look up the term boondoggle.

nixit
3 years ago
Reply to  Mary Ladd

There are a dozen or so billion-dollar Silicon Valley non-profits who could cut a check for remaining amount and it would barely cause a ripple in their portfolios. Strange that they haven’t done so.

Ataraxis
3 years ago

This is very disappointing.
I really want to see the Obama Hubris Center for Zero Accomplishments completed as a monument to his utter vacuity.
In a perfect world, one would walk through an entrance with digital signs tabulating in real time Obama’s net worth and number of houses, into huge empty rooms displaying all that he accomplished in his Administration About Nothing. In the basement, visitors would gaze from a balcony into a bottomless black abyss signifying all of Obama’s unknown past, which has been disappeared forever, as if it never existed.

Ataraxis
3 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Few people realize that the Obama Center is NOT a Presidential Library run by the National Archives where all his records are held. His 30 million presidential records will eventually only be available digitally. Get it? No hard copies that can’t be manipulated or hidden. How convenient. But totally expected and fitting from The Man With No Past. I propose that one of the big empty rooms in the new Obama Hubris Center have massive floor to ceiling bookcases on all four walls, but there should only be a single book in the entire room titled President Obama’s Accomplishments. That… Read more »

debtsor
3 years ago
Reply to  Ataraxis

Obama was colloquially called the Deporter-in-Chief for removing (aka deporting) large numbers of illegal aliens.

And for that, he receives one entry in his otherwise empty book of accomplishments. I will give credit where credit is due.

Last edited 3 years ago by debtsor
Ataraxis
3 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

Since some of what he did might be labeled as accomplishments but were not were designed with any lasting permanence, I propose that the Obama Hubris Center be built on a foundation of sand.

Old Joe
3 years ago
Reply to  Ataraxis

Ataraxis, I like your prose

Ataraxis
3 years ago
Reply to  Old Joe

Gotta elevate your game at Wirepoints!

Ataraxis
3 years ago
Reply to  Ataraxis

Charlatans like Obama really bug me, he’s nothing more than a skillful alderman out to game the system for money.
Here you had one of the youngest recent presidents, with an opportunity to implement new ideas and policies, and yet his playbook was just a tired retread of FDR. His administration is when the country realized that the Dems are truly out of ideas, hence the Dem pivot to all the outlandish woke garbage.

debtsor
3 years ago

This is evidence that despite the Biden regime being Obama’s unofficial third term, Obama is not actually in charge. If he were actually in charge (as one theory goes), he’d be selling his influence in exchange for donations, and this foundation would be on better financial footings. Just as the Clinton Foundation Hillary ran while Secretary of State floundered after Hillary lost in 2016, the same is apparent here.

So inevitably, the next question is: if Obama isn’t the defacto head of the Biden Regime, who actually is?

Freddy
3 years ago

That’s where it should be built “underwater” and the only visitors will be Lloyd Bridges and Jacques Cousteau.

Last edited 3 years ago by Freddy

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE