Transportation Justice, Chicago Mayor Lightfoot Style – Chicago Contrarian

"The argument at hand is not that a transit infrastructure should not be modernized or improved, nor that we should not have more accessible transportation options. The argument is not that a TIF district should not be established. The point of contention is that the residents who are going to finance the proposed TIF district are residents who stand to gain minimally, if at all, while absolving others of burden who contribute nothing and stand to benefit substantially."
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Old Joe
3 years ago

It used to be called taxation without representation and has come full circle in Chicago.

nixit
3 years ago

Even some transit advocates are against this project as it siphons away funds from better transit improvements.

debtsor
3 years ago

The real purposes of the red line expansion is to provide a union job boondoogle for a decade.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE