Thanks to a new tax break from Springfield, more residential builders find they can set aside 20% of units and still make money.... For developers, the property tax savings offset the revenue they lose by charging below-market rents on 20% of their apartments. Under the state program, a developer that sets aside 20% of units as affordable to tenants at 60% of area median income qualifies for a 30-year reduction in the building’s property tax assessments.
Well this show is come to an end for a long time. The upcoming recession will be accompanied with high interest rates and a low rate of new housing starts.
nixit
3 years ago
Why not create developments in which most of the units are at or above market rate but that premium is used to subsidize the below-market rate units? That way, the people who truly believe in subsidized housing can put their money where their mouths are and actually live in these properties.
Ming the Merciless
3 years ago
Democrats, destroying every neighborhood they can except their own
Giddyap
3 years ago
: Draconian Rules And Mandates Are Not The Answer For Affordable Housing — The Answer Is Tax Incentives For Developers
Chicago keeps piling stupid layer on stupid layer on its affordable housing program. This tax break has to be paid for by other property owners, driving up rents and reducing the value of their investments.
The irony is that affordable housing is only affordable for the first owner. IIRC, the first owner can, after some time, resell the unit at market price, which of course is higher than the affordable housing price. Which creates the need for more affordable housing.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Well this show is come to an end for a long time. The upcoming recession will be accompanied with high interest rates and a low rate of new housing starts.
Why not create developments in which most of the units are at or above market rate but that premium is used to subsidize the below-market rate units? That way, the people who truly believe in subsidized housing can put their money where their mouths are and actually live in these properties.
Democrats, destroying every neighborhood they can except their own
: Draconian Rules And Mandates Are Not The Answer For Affordable Housing — The Answer Is Tax Incentives For Developers
Chicago keeps piling stupid layer on stupid layer on its affordable housing program. This tax break has to be paid for by other property owners, driving up rents and reducing the value of their investments.
The irony is that affordable housing is only affordable for the first owner. IIRC, the first owner can, after some time, resell the unit at market price, which of course is higher than the affordable housing price. Which creates the need for more affordable housing.