Courts, bargaining table are likely next fronts in battle over Illinois workers’ rights amendment – Chicago Tribune*

Nearly every phrase of the 119-word amendment is likely to be parsed by labor and management attorneys as new groups of workers seek to organize and existing unions use the new language to strengthen their position at the bargaining table. Among issues for potential legal disputes are who counts as an “employee” covered by the amendment, how the language comports with existing state and federal law, and what falls within the bounds of “economic welfare” and “safety at work.”
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
outraged
3 years ago

Collective bargaining should be gone for gubmint employees. What a colossal blunder.

Pensions Paid First
3 years ago
Reply to  outraged

It’s their constitutional right. America has a great history of allowing the people to vote for their representation as well as amending the constitution to its fair and just values. Why do you hate the constitution and America? You’re looking for a dictatorship where you are in charge. Not going to happen. Instead you can just be outraged when they exercise their constitutional rights.

nixit
3 years ago

At the very least, I would think any law or ordinance that requires employees to live in the city in which they work (ie: Chicago) could be overridden via collective bargaining. If I were a city employee, I would place a dollar value on the residency requirement and force the city to either a) compensate me for it or b) remove it entirely.

Let the games begin.

debtsor
3 years ago
Reply to  nixit

The residency requirement is a double-edged sword. The requirement is why real estate prices in the far NW and SW neighborhoods remain stable. The requirement creates the demand for these neighborhoods. If you let city workers move from Edison Park to Park Ridge, or Mt. Greenwood into Evergreen Park, just who exactly is going to buy up these properties? What demand is there to live in Oriole Park other than city workers who aren’t allowed to live 1 mile north of Higgins Road, or on the southside, 6 blocks west of Cicero Ave.? What’ll happen is that these people will… Read more »

Last edited 3 years ago by debtsor
nixit
3 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

That’s not the city employees’ problem, that’s the city’s problem. Virtually every other city and school district in Illinois does not require their employees to live where they work.

Aaron
3 years ago
Reply to  nixit

Remote work from florida

Goodgulf Greyteeth
3 years ago

An article that does the amendment’s supporters the courtesy of identifying them as really reasonable people motivated by their intent to make things better for everyone by requiring more of the stuff that’s already not working as advertised.

Tells us nothing we didn’t already know, and does it at length and badly.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE