Over 1 in 3 Illinois government workers reject AFSCME Council 31 membership – Illinois Policy

It could be because just 21 cents of every dollar the union spends is on representing workers – what should be its core priority. It could be the millions of dollars AFSCME Council 31 spends on politics, or the exorbitant six-figure salaries it pays its bosses. And it could be the union’s questionable spending on restaurants and hotels.
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Just another day in Chicago
11 months ago

Another way to look at it is that they put the money into the City Council, creating key alliances with the Alders that won because AFSCME funded their campaigns and got the vote out. So long term, their contracts will sail through the council as will all other pro-labor matters. Live test: See how many AFSCME jobs are cut in the next round of budget revisions.

David F
11 months ago

Bad link. 🙁

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE