Illinois considers lowering scores students need to be considered proficient on state exams – Chalkbeat Chicago

“Our system unfairly mislabels students as ‘not proficient’ when other data — such as success in advanced coursework and enrollment in college — tell a very different story,” state schools chief Tony Sanders wrote in a message to school leaders this week.
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fed Up Taxpayer
10 months ago

Try finding the hard, numerical results of ACT or SAT performance of your local public high school. Good luck. They only tout their proficiency in each grade, which now will be even more watered down if this idea is implemented. If parents continue to allow this nonsense by paying higher and higher property taxes for “the kids” (when all they are doing is funding the pensions) and electing the numbskulls to office that support it, there will be no end to this. Look at Hinsdale a number of years ago, that held the extracurricular activities hostage because they had “nowhere”… Read more »

Bobbi
10 months ago

You knew this would be their “solution” to low test scores. It’s already happened a few times now. Let’s give the teachers an unannounced ACT test as part of their contract. I bet50% of them score below 18.

Bockscar
10 months ago
Reply to  Bobbi

Here’s a link to take and score a sample ACT test. You can see if you meet Illinois proficiency standards. Take it and report back with your score!!

https://www.act.org/content/act/en/students-and-parents/high-school-success/testing-advice-for-the-act/free-act-practice-test.html

Deb
10 months ago

Let’s not hold teachers and school districts accountable for a failing public school system and for teachers more concerned about their paychecks than students. Lowering the standards to make teachers and school districts never works out well for student education. Fire teachers who are chronically absent. Tie teacher pay to student. outcomes Cut taxpayer funds to schools with poor test scores. IL needs to accept responsibility for failing test scores and develop a plan (other than lowering requirements) to improve test scores. Schools and teachers need to stop blaming everyone else for their failures. They blame parents, who were probably… Read more »

Steve in Naperville
10 months ago

Welcome to Illinois…. where are the school system creates ignorant and uneducated and illiterate woke radicals pushes them through the school system handsome a worthless piece of paper. Meanwhile, they can’t read or write or do basic arithmetic in math and to boot on top of all that we get to pay the highest land, taxes, and taxes at the state and local level in the United States we should all be raised at this information in these numbers and this behavior of these people that are supposedly running our school system a complete failure I give them all an… Read more »

Hello, Indiana!
10 months ago

Of course they want to lower scores. It’s called “ dumbing down “ so as not to have overpaid, underperforming teachers with fat salaries and pensions being embarrassed by continually passing along students than can neither read or do math at their grade level.

Call my shrink
10 months ago

When I took tests in school and got caught looking at another students paper it was called cheating and got an F. Now districts to pump up their efficiency ratings ca cheat. I was born in the wrong era.

I M Intelligent
10 months ago

Here Tony Sanders goes again, past Elgin U46 Superintendent, yet wasn’t legally qualified as he couldn’t even sign it’s checks! His last name has done him well as he’s promoted to the top State job because of it.

daskoterzar
10 months ago

So instead of actually teaching and educating students, ya know, just lower the requirements to take the heat off of the School Districts, Administration and Teachers? Is that it? “Our system unfairly mislabels students as ‘not proficient’ when other data — such as success in advanced coursework and enrollment in college — tell a very different story,” state schools chief Tony Sanders wrote in a message to school leaders this week. This smells like a highly compensated bureaucrat educator cooking up a way to boil the numbers and statistics enough to make the stats “look” better, so the measurable performance problem goes… Read more »

James
10 months ago
Reply to  daskoterzar

Of what practical value is to state something as a “standard” when so few students and school systems as a whole accomplish it? Isn’t that term more commonly used when minimally the majority meet those conditions? I understand your point of view while thinking the term is a ridiculous one for the reality of the situation. To me “standard “ and “grade level” are used somewhat equally as I’ve suggested here. “Your mileage may vary.”

ProzacPlease
10 months ago
Reply to  James

In any occupation, standards are not meant to simply represent the median of all applicants. Standards enforce the competency required to safely and effectively perform the job.

Literacy is a basic requirement to function responsibly in an advanced economy. Grading on a curve so that the majority “pass” doesn’t cut it.

Last edited 10 months ago by ProzacPlease
James
10 months ago
Reply to  ProzacPlease

If hardly anyone can perform at a lofty expectation maybe set by an expert in that given work, then why is that given a mediocre, mundane designation as the “standard” when real performances results should designate that higher performance using a term such as “superior” or”excellent”? We’re taking semantics here, of course, but as is sometimes said words matter. “Standard” to me implies ordinary performance rather than superior or excellent. Standard to me might be what’s expected of a B- or C+ student’s performance. You put a higher performance expectation on the word “standard” than I do apparrently. In the… Read more »

ProzacPlease
10 months ago
Reply to  James

Maybe it’s just semantics to you, but it matters to young people who will not be functional in the information economy.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE