Paul Vallas: Is It Too Much to Ask the City of Chicago to Protect Police and Witnesses? – Chicago Contrarian

"There is no provision in the so-called SAFE-T Act — nor any city ordinance — that sends a clear, uncompromising message that shooting at police officers or threatening witnesses and victims will bring swift and serious consequences. ... This rise in attacks on officers is no accident. It is the direct result of decisions made by elected officials who have shackled proactive policing, undermined accountability, and signaled that violent offenders can act with impunity."
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pat S.
10 months ago

This article should be required reading for all IL politicians.

Thank you, Mr. Vallas for a well written and timely analysis. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knew the SAFE-T Act was going to be a debacle.

It is.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE