Chicago Joins Suit Against Trump Administration Over Its Targeting Of Sanctuary Cities – Block Club Chicago

“Federal funding should never be used as a tool to coerce local authorities into compliance with unlawful mandates,” the city’s Corporation Counsel Mary Richardson-Lowry said in a statement. That threat of losing federal funds has also injected “significant confusion and uncertainty” in Chicago’s 2026 budget process, lawyers argue. Chicago is facing a $1.1 billion budget hole in 2026 and an even greater projected spending gap in 2027.
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MartinEden
9 months ago

Let’s go! Sadly BJ isn’t doing a perp walk (yet). The law is the law. If you don’t like it, change it…

Right to jail.

mqyl
9 months ago

“Targeting sanctuary cities” would seem to be a logical step for the feds, given the high concentration of illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities. In place of “a logical step,” we also would have accepted “a no-brainer.”

Fed up neighbor
9 months ago

Hopefully someday there will be a different headline on wirepoints reading Pritzker and Springfield politicians named in massive class action lawsuit against Property Tax scandal in Illinois.

Chercher
9 months ago

Chicago has another option, that will restore all Federal funding and save the time and funding of a costly suit. Follow the law.

The Railroader
9 months ago

Oddly, Leftist administrations have used Federal Funding as a cudgel for decades.

Isn’t Illinois Fun?
9 months ago

“Federal funding should never be used as a tool to coerce local authorities into compliance with unlawful mandates,” – let’s rephrase – city, county and state governments should not spend billions undermining federal immigration laws, enforcement and the deportation of illegals, especially criminals. Let’s add this, they should not put illegals ahead of legal residents and citizens, some of who need help being diverted to illegals. That all aside, I read that Trump isn’t deporting as many as did St. Obama. How is Trump a problem on this issue and Obama wasn’t? Pure politics.

MartinEden
9 months ago

Pure hypocrisy. Any integrity left in the Democrat party is gone.

Old Joe
9 months ago

Pulling federal funding was straight out of the Dem play book since the 60’s.

David F
9 months ago

Pull ALL the Billions in federal money from Chicago…

Deb
9 months ago

Quit wasting taxpayer money and comply with federal laws.

Call my shrink
9 months ago

Poll the citizens of Chicago, especially the poor and homeless, and ask their views on illegal immigration. They are part of the city too.

Nostradamus
9 months ago
Reply to  Call my shrink

Exactly. I don’t remember ever voting for sanctuary city status when I lived and worked in Chicago. Or even getting the chance to vote on it.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE