Illinois lawmakers approve ban on immigration arrests near courthouses – CBS2 (Chicago)

The legislation, approved largely along party lines, also requires hospitals, day care centers and higher education institutions to create policies delineating how they would handle immigration agents inside their facilities.
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JackBolly
6 months ago

Harmon says probably unconstitutional, but we’ll try. IL is an absolute embarrassment.

Hello, Indiana!
6 months ago

Let’s extend that ban to when someone is lurking around the virtue signalers houses , crashes into their car under the influence or outright attacks them, as has happened across America.

Call my shrink
6 months ago

Rallying cry to the dem lawmakers. ” We got to get out and protect our future voters ” . I hope they can afford the taxes

Isn’t Illinois Fun?
6 months ago

Seems like IL doesn’t want arrests of any kind, anywhere. But that’s another topic. What is so wrong with arresting illegals as they leave court having been found guilty of a crime in that court?

The guy Im commenting to is a dumbass
6 months ago

Because those “illegals” are still owed due process under the constitution that you, a “legal”, can’t be bothered to read or remember. Not even mentioning that statistically most of the arrests made have NOT been felons or gang members.

What’s more “wrong”, to answer your dumbass question, is supporting the unwarranted stripping of people’s rights and then having the gall to try and hold the moral high ground as if you aren’t parroting an orange clown narcissists favorite talking points. Learn how the world works before proving to everyone in the room you’re an idiot.

Admin
6 months ago

Please clean up your language and name if you want to comment here, and easy on the insults.

Isn’t Illinois Fun?
6 months ago

Somebody needs a hug. Better that you had explained the process for deporting criminal illegals for all of us dullards and “how the world works”. In the meantime, here’s a brief summary. “How the process can be limited Expedited removal: Under certain circumstances, like a recent entry or a serious criminal offense, an immigration officer can deport an individual without a full hearing. Limited attorney access: In some cases, particularly with expedited removal, there may be little to no opportunity to consult with an attorney. Civil vs. criminal proceedings: Because deportation is a civil, not a criminal, matter, immigrants facing… Read more »

anna
6 months ago

Under long-standing U.S immigration policy, violating the terms of one’s visa- overstaying-is clear grounds for deportation.
Claims that they are being denied due process are unfounded; under U.S Law, a trial is not required to deport some who has violated the terms of their residency.
illegals who violate their visa do not have immunity from the consequences of their actions.

anna
6 months ago

“not even mentioning that statistically most of the arrests made have NOT been felons or gang members…”
Laken Riley and Jocelyn Nungaray’s illegal alien killers didn’t have convictions in the US beforehand
Is ICE supposed to wait until someone commits a serious crime before enforcing the laws?
If. your’e parroting Ben Bradley’s talking points consider that his data doesn’t include those with pending charges/cases. Convictions only.
I would also be curious to know who many illegals were charged with crimes that were subsequently dropped by sanctuary city DA’s and judges as well

Last edited 6 months ago by anna

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE