Chicago Tries to Stiff the Pension Piper – The American Interest

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
steve-o
10 years ago

The article-writer (as so many “analysts” of the govt ‘ee pension disaster do) ignores the overall problem of the egregiously large (too big and too early) pension promises. It is grossly unfair to extract SO much money out of the private sector to fund these excessive promises. The pensions must be cut…..that’s job 1. Then job 2 is to get the costs down to a responsible 10% of payroll (down from about 70% of payroll now, believe it or not).

Jim Palermo
10 years ago

“And he’s throwing it all on red, as Allysia Finley writes in the WSJ”. Not really. Betting on ‘red’ on the roulette wheel gives the player a probability of winning that
is just shy of 50%. The mayor is betting on green, the ‘0’ and ’00’ slots that have about a 5% chance of winning.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE