LyLena Estabine, of the Illinois Policy Institute: "Technology companies understand their innovations require significant energy, and they have demonstrated a willingness to pay for it. Recently, seven major data center customers pledged $2 billion to ComEd to cover transmission charges in Illinois during the next decade and shield customers from extra costs that might result from their energy demands."
And I’ve got a toll bridge in Brooklyn at a great price for you. When did pledges become fungible!?
Last edited 3 months ago by JackBolly
Deb
3 months ago
But in the wealthy suburbs, the theme is “not in my neighborhood “. Put the data centers where the investors live.
David F
3 months ago
What Illinois needs is to require each of these centers to install the small nuclear reactor that has been developed for large factories.
Fed Up Taxpyer
3 months ago
It should be a state requirement for nonprofits to publicly disclose relationships or benefits to the proposed legislation when commenting on that legislation. If their donations come from related parties to the data centers, they should have to disclose it when publishing biased viewpoints. Additionally, while it is legal, their use of the state’s name in their title is misleading as if they are conducting official business of the state. Reader and taxpayer beware.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
And I’ve got a toll bridge in Brooklyn at a great price for you. When did pledges become fungible!?
But in the wealthy suburbs, the theme is “not in my neighborhood “. Put the data centers where the investors live.
What Illinois needs is to require each of these centers to install the small nuclear reactor that has been developed for large factories.
It should be a state requirement for nonprofits to publicly disclose relationships or benefits to the proposed legislation when commenting on that legislation. If their donations come from related parties to the data centers, they should have to disclose it when publishing biased viewpoints. Additionally, while it is legal, their use of the state’s name in their title is misleading as if they are conducting official business of the state. Reader and taxpayer beware.