Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.
Why would Crain’s endorse him then? No logic. Crain’s has become the poster child for reporters that don’t understand microeconomics.
It’s an op-ed piece by someone at IPI.
While I don’t disagree with the IPI author, couldn’t a progressive tax increase be worse than being a de facto pension tax? By this I mean – and the last two Illinois tax increases more or less prove the point – is that the additional tax revenue – which may be less than planned due to taxpayers with means voting with their feet – will not be spent on reducing pension liabilities but rather will be used to spend even more taxpayer money on politicians’ various projects – with the result that the operating deficits will be even greater than… Read more »