Beating A Dead Horse, Etc.: Here’s More Research On Public Pensions and the ‘Contracts Clause’ – Forbes

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NB-Chicago
6 years ago

Fantastic Bauer article. I’m not an accountant, actuary or lawyer–but tried to make point in another wp comment. If pension reform constitutional amendment was attempted and legal battle ensued pitting States fiscal obligation to provide “Higher Public Propose” (funding for basic services-schools, police, etc) as being crowed out by pension obligations (protected under Contract Clause) how do you weigh, from overall pot of taxable funds available, how much is required for “Higher Public Propose” vrs pensions? At what point or using what method is it determined that tax payers have paid enough? Is the pension debt $137 bill or $241… Read more »

Fed up neighbor
6 years ago

Very good article, but who in Illinois will do anything about it. Nobody, sorry to say

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE