After vagueness hearing, federal judge could strike down Illinois’ gun ban – Center Square

Attorney Thomas Maag argued the law is vague around the list of firearms and around magazines because there are a slew of such devices that are interchangeable between rifles and handguns. Arguing for the state, attorney Christopher Wells said Maag’s argument doesn’t rise to the level of a successful vagueness challenge. Judge Stephen McGlynn said the crux is whether the law infringes on a constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Victor
2 years ago

Hey Judge, I will make it easy for you. Of course it violates the Constitution.

Giddyap
2 years ago

If the news this week from Israel has taught us anything, it’s the need for homeowners to arm themselves

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE