-- Connecting the dots between our economy, government and business --
The Right to Protest order directs the Chicago Police Department to work with protest organizers to find alternative locations or plans if federal law enforcement disrupts lawful demonstrations, while maintaining public safety and respecting First Amendment rights.
Summary and audio linked here.
Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.
Expect no retraction or apology. This what they do.
The state’s existing buyout program for its own pensions is the precedent for Chicago, which should be a warning: Look out for similar exaggerated claims and shoddy analysis.
Full interview and summary linked here.
SIGN UP HERE FOR OUR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER
This action by the Pinhead is simply to make people mad, separate groups and divide. There must also be some sort of pay off for him here someplace…Vote them out.
There are city resources that have to be on-hand. For circumstances when the city requires a permit for the protesting, the permit fees should be a fairly high enough $ amount to cover resource costs.
Why didn’t the founding fathers assure that we had the right to public protest? Thank God Johnson thought of this.
BJ still believes that the George Floyd drug overdose rioting was in fact fiery but mostly peaceful.
johnson wants civil war.
So the police are to work (obstruct) with community activists to avoid ICE?
Great name for the EO you clown. Keep twisting that language.
Is he even qualified to sign executive orders?
This loser Johnson should re-read the oath he took when he assumed his office.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I am duly qualified according to the constitution of this state to exercise the duties of this office to which I have been elected and that I will, to the best of my ability, exercise the duties thereof and protect and defend the constitution of this state and that of the United States of America. So help me God!”
Do his actions really represent the “best” of his abilities?