Chicago signals intention to make full pension contributions – The Bond Buyer

Comment: Keep in mind that full doesn't really mean full. It just means paying what was set by the legislature, which is far short of what's needed even for the pensions to tread water. Taxpayer pension contributions have to double by 2033 just to get to the point where the growth in unfunded liabilities stops.
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike
6 years ago

“Chicago is currently adhering to a non-actuarial ramp with set payments laid out in statute through 2020 when an actuarial contribution then hits for police and firefighters and through 2022 when it hits for municipal and laborers.”

That’s the result of the General Assembly overriding Governor Rauner’s veto of SB 777, creating PA 99-0506 effective May 30, 2016.

Bob out of here
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

PA 099-0506 is what is responsible for my leaving Chicago. In one of the city’s bond offerings they laid out what the contribution amounts will be under an actuarially required contribution, and the numbers are staggeringly bad. Too bad everyone looked at me like I was crazy, because now those that failed to heed my advice are complaining about property taxes. And you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Mike
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

PA 99-0506 changed employer contributions to the Chicago Police and Chicago Fire pension funds.

Employer contributions to the Chicago Laborers (LABF) and Chicago Municipal (MEABF) changed when the General Assembly overrode Governor Rauner’s veto of SB 42 on July 6, 2017, resulting in PA 100-0023.

http://www.civicfed.org/civic-federation/blog/chicago-municipal-and-laborers-pension-funding-changes-approved-part-state

Mike
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

The required employer contributions to the five state pension funds (TRS, SURS, SERS, JRS, GARS) during the 15 year ramp period (Edgar Ramp) of the 50 year funding schedule in Public Act 88-0593 were also non-actuarial. In Illinois pension vernacular, required employer contributions to pension funds described as ramps and holidays are non-actuarial. Illinois state law mandated many such non-actuarial employer contributions to many pension funds over the decades. In such instances the state law intentionally ignored actuarial recommendations. Yet for decades rather than emphasizing that fact, employers, politicians, and the press often would proclaim the required employer contribution was… Read more »

Mike
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike

And according to some (not WirePoints) the Illinois State Constitution protects the Ponzi Scheme, which in turn is protected by the US Constitution.

Full pension contributions less than actuarial required, the Illinois Pension Ponzi Scheme, and state and Federal constitutional law, politics, and the media from the Land of Lincoln.

So much intrigue.

Will the US Constitution protect Squeezy the Pension Python.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE