This analysis suggests who would potentially be affected by Mayor Brandon Johnson’s proposal: less than 1 percent of all licensed businesses in Chicago; roughly 20 percent of jobs at companies across the city; and companies where an average salary is estimated to be roughly $111,000.
Big difference between $4/month per employee and $33/month per employee. Common sense says a lot of businesses will not look favorably on a $29 difference. Not a good analysis when they say $4 wasn’t so bad, so $33 shouldn’t be either.
Call my shrink
5 months ago
If there was any way to tax the CPS/CTU a 33 buck head tax on teachers this would be over and done with.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Big difference between $4/month per employee and $33/month per employee. Common sense says a lot of businesses will not look favorably on a $29 difference. Not a good analysis when they say $4 wasn’t so bad, so $33 shouldn’t be either.
If there was any way to tax the CPS/CTU a 33 buck head tax on teachers this would be over and done with.
“A WBEZ analysis….” Two of their four “experts” being far left Bruno and Martire. As we say here, the jokes write themselves.
How about the city cut 33 dollars a month from each city employee. If that doesn’t help start cutting programs and employees.