"Looking at it historically, the mayor of Chicago has about maybe 10% of the influence now, the impact in Springfield now, than when I started as a reporter 50 some years ago," said Charlie Wheeler, retired director of the public affairs reporting program at the University of Illinois Springfield. "It's a combination of the old patronage system kind of going out of fashion because of court rulings, and the evolution of the Democratic Party as becoming more rooted in the suburbs than it was historically. Those folks don't really have to worry about the mayor of Chicago."
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Chicago is still the largest engine that drives the states economy. It will matter when Chicago completes its decent into economic hell!