Chicago’s water-bill delinquents include City Council members – Chicago Sun-Times

Altogether, City Hall has more than $770 million on its books in water and sewer customers’ unpaid bills owed by tens of thousands of people and companies. Suburbs behind on their water bills include Robbins ($10.8 million, going back a decade), Harvey (at least $4.8 million, down from more than $20 million because of a court-ordered payment plan), and Riverdale ($635,000).
20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
9mm
1 year ago

In the suburbs, before the Chicago invasion, they would just shut your water supply off.

Mike Ropenniss
1 year ago
Reply to  9mm

Well now that’s just racist………unless you’re White

Taxpayer
1 year ago

Council members mentality:: Well if the mayor doesn’t pay his bills, why should we. I thought it was a perk that goes along with the job

debtsor
1 year ago

Not too unironically, the city increased its water rates to paying suburban customers. My water bill has skyrocketed in the past several years.

Reese
1 year ago

Will somebody explain to me what is behind this trend of not paying utility bills? I read the article and a couple of the explanations from individuals seemed rational. But the backlog of unpaid bills–bills that will most likely never be paid–is astounding. Are other large cities like this or is Chicago unique in its dismal collection efforts?
People in Chicago don’t want to pay their utility bills, their rent, their student loans…and shoplifters and robbers go free…
My parents raised 10 children and we were taught to be financially responsible. We went without before we’d get in debt.

Reese
1 year ago
Reply to  Reese

Let me add I know inflation is rough right now. And, of course, medical debt can be devastating. But you can at least work out a payment plan. Just think it is weird when highly paid, high profile people skip paying their bills.

debtsor
1 year ago
Reply to  Reese

Medical debt is not devastating. That’s the lie that known liars like Elizabeth Warren repeat over and over again. She authored a BS study that said medical debt was teh leading cause of bankruptcy, which is a lie, it’s credit card debt, not medical debt. The uninsured rate in this country is low after obamacare because poor people get free medical care with medicaid, and semi-poor people get free credits to buy health insurance through the marketplace. The only group of people (other than illegals who don’t pay anyways) who don’t have health insurance are able bodied people who intentionally… Read more »

Pensions Paid First
1 year ago
Reply to  debtsor

Not to mention that medical debt that is less than $500 doesn’t hurt ones credit score anymore. Few will sue for the $500 so there isn’t any fiscal incentive to pay these types of bills.

debtsor
1 year ago

You’d be surprised how few hospitals sue for $5,000 or even $10,000. Most hospitals are not-for-profit and they write off bad debt as charity care to help preserve the non-profit status. There were major articles about this several years back and now many hospitals have stopped suing patients at all.

Pensions Paid First
1 year ago
Reply to  debtsor

Makes sense. Without the credit score threat for lower amounts, the incentive to pay just doesn’t exist. I know several doctors that told me after the housing crash in 2007, people stopped paying their copays. One told me that since people stopped refinancing their homes (many underwater so refinancing not an option) they didn’t even care about the credit score hit. Now that threat doesn’t exist so I would expect non-payments in medical debt to only increase.

PT Bombast
1 year ago

There are optional contracts and pension contracts. Under what philosophical principle do public employees ignore their obligations but insist on their sinecures? I guess size matters — as it does in most decisions on whether to pursue “legal rights” or meet legal obligations.

“Honesty in small things is not a small thing.” To avoid hypocrisy, shouldn’t you be registering some disapproval rather than offering justification?

Pensions Paid First
1 year ago
Reply to  PT Bombast

You seem to be confusing me stating the reality of paying medical debt with me offering justification. I made no statement endorsing such a tactic but merely pointed out the incentive to not pay. “Under what philosophical principle do public employees ignore their obligations but insist on their sinecures?” “Sinecures” doesn’t apply in this instance. The pay and benefits that they receive come from the labor they provide at their job. It’s not tied to personal debt that has nothing to do with their job. “To avoid hypocrisy, shouldn’t you be registering some disapproval rather than offering justification?” Sure, they… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Pensions Paid First
PT Bombast
1 year ago

As to sinecures, I’m just using the term applied by the Supreme Court, albeit before both our times. “The promised compensation for services actually performed and accepted during the continuance of the particular agency may undoubtedly be claimed, both upon principles of compact and of equity, but to insist beyond this on the perpetuation of a public policy either useless or detrimental, and upon a reward for acts neither desired nor performed, would appear to be reconcilable with neither common justice nor common sense. The establishment of such a principle would arrest necessarily everything like progress or improvement in government,… Read more »

Reese
1 year ago
Reply to  debtsor

Debtsor, you didn’t answer my earlier question–is chicago unique in its dismal debt collection or are most large U.S. cities like this? I appreciate your comments. –Sincerely, Reese.

debtsor
1 year ago
Reply to  Reese

I don’t know, to be honest. I do know that Chicago is unique in the sense that it sells great lakes water to other municipalities outside the watershed, which it would otherwise not be able to do. These non-paying municipalities could get their own ground water and treat it themselves, but let’s be honest, they are run so dysfunctionally, they could never do it on their own. I think other metro areas that don’t use ground water have regional setups that address water delivery.

Reese
1 year ago
Reply to  debtsor

Ok. thanks. I always watch for your postings as I find them interesting. sincerely, reese

debtsor
1 year ago
Reply to  Reese

I’m glad someone finds them interesting. These are conversations I can’t have in public with polite company, aka an office full of libs!

William Butler Hickok
1 year ago

All of those receivables and the amount
That gets collected will be small. The monies continue to drain on what the city can sustain on a depleted revenue stream, soon
Something will break and not be able to be
Repaired. The downwards spiral continues.

Old Joe
1 year ago

Hmm, has BJ squared up his delinquency yet? Surely his mayoral salary ought to be enough to cover his arrearage.

William Butler Hickok
1 year ago
Reply to  Old Joe

Don’t know if Zippy paid up yet, do know if you bring unpaid bills up poor Zippy gets the vapors and starts running

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE