Jim Nowlan: "Moderates have been largely squeezed out of political relevance by acrimonious polarization, plus the extreme gerrymandering of congressional and legislative districts in many states. You know how it works: The dominant party redraws districts and cherry-picks its voters, while concentrating the minority party’s voters in fewer districts. The dominant party in each resulting district controls the primary, which becomes the election, where unorganized moderates either lack the numbers to compete or simply don’t participate."
Moderates, LOL. Moderates are the most wishy-washy of the bunch, the ‘half way’ group of losers. Such as agreeing to abortions maybe halfway through pregnancy. That’s moderate, right? 20 weeks is the middle of Democrats and Republicans? Or how about transgender surgeries for minors…well, young kids shouldn’t transition, but if they are 12 or older, sure, full regiment of hormones! Or men in women’s sports “only if they transitioned a long time ago” or censorship “well, some views Democrats don’t like should be censored, but not all of them.”
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Moderates, LOL. Moderates are the most wishy-washy of the bunch, the ‘half way’ group of losers. Such as agreeing to abortions maybe halfway through pregnancy. That’s moderate, right? 20 weeks is the middle of Democrats and Republicans? Or how about transgender surgeries for minors…well, young kids shouldn’t transition, but if they are 12 or older, sure, full regiment of hormones! Or men in women’s sports “only if they transitioned a long time ago” or censorship “well, some views Democrats don’t like should be censored, but not all of them.”
Those aren’t moderates. Those are the extreme left which is the flip side of the coin you are on.