Editorial: How to save the Chicago casino nobody seems to want to run – Chicago Tribune*

"The problems aren’t new but they’re persistent impediments, beginning with the proposed tax of 40%. That’s better than the absurd 72% rate first proposed by the city, but it’s still an onerous burden for any company looking for a return on an investment likely to exceed $2 billion, especially given that the city’s request for proposals requires a hotel, meeting rooms, shops, restaurant spaces and, this being Chicago, a variety of obligations to use various local beneficiaries as subcontractors and sub-operators."
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ex Illini
4 years ago

Typical Chicago arrogance. City leaders feel everyone is clamoring to do business in Chiraq. The casino won’t happen anytime soon.

The Paraclete
4 years ago

Partnering on anything with the city is an invitation to your destruction. The agreed upon term sheets will be living documents subject to codified revisions at the city’s whim. Return on your investment does not reflect community equity. The magic word for freeloading slugs; Equity! Hmmmmm…some operators skipping Lori’s RFP theatre. Why bother, the preliminary requirements are ridiculous examples of Chicago math.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE