"The problems aren’t new but they’re persistent impediments, beginning with the proposed tax of 40%. That’s better than the absurd 72% rate first proposed by the city, but it’s still an onerous burden for any company looking for a return on an investment likely to exceed $2 billion, especially given that the city’s request for proposals requires a hotel, meeting rooms, shops, restaurant spaces and, this being Chicago, a variety of obligations to use various local beneficiaries as subcontractors and sub-operators."
Typical Chicago arrogance. City leaders feel everyone is clamoring to do business in Chiraq. The casino won’t happen anytime soon.
The Paraclete
4 years ago
Partnering on anything with the city is an invitation to your destruction. The agreed upon term sheets will be living documents subject to codified revisions at the city’s whim. Return on your investment does not reflect community equity. The magic word for freeloading slugs; Equity! Hmmmmm…some operators skipping Lori’s RFP theatre. Why bother, the preliminary requirements are ridiculous examples of Chicago math.
Typical Chicago arrogance. City leaders feel everyone is clamoring to do business in Chiraq. The casino won’t happen anytime soon.
Partnering on anything with the city is an invitation to your destruction. The agreed upon term sheets will be living documents subject to codified revisions at the city’s whim. Return on your investment does not reflect community equity. The magic word for freeloading slugs; Equity! Hmmmmm…some operators skipping Lori’s RFP theatre. Why bother, the preliminary requirements are ridiculous examples of Chicago math.