Evanston-Skokie D65 may close four schools; it must cut $10 to $15 million due to deficits – Pioneer Press*

Assistant Superintendent of Academics Stacy Beardsley said the district will need to keep making cuts to its budget in the next school year, even after slashing 73 jobs in the last school year.
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fed up neighbor
10 months ago

265 million plus in the hole at Valley View 365u time for closings and cuts also.

PPF
10 months ago

That or increasing taxes. Those are your only choices.

Media Scrutiny
10 months ago

How refreshing. A School District that acknowledges its fiscal shortcomings, and resolves to take concrete steps to rectify it Without asking Taxpayers for more money.
The Chicago Public Schools should try that approach, but Mayor Johnson doesn’t want to alienate the foot soldiers and donations he’ll need to get reelected.

Deb
10 months ago

Chicago should follow their lead.

Where's Mine ???
10 months ago
Reply to  Deb

yeah, but in Chicago we suffer from are “systemic community disinvestment” blah, blah, blah bs.

PPF
10 months ago

That’s the message they keep using to get their people elected. Apparently the majority of the Chicago voters agree with them.

Admin
10 months ago
Reply to  PPF

I don’t think they agree. Trump is particularly unpopular in Chicago, Chicagoans are pro-choice and they vote Dem robotically. Those are the main reasons they vote as they do.

PPF
10 months ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Maybe the ILGOP shouldn’t run a candidate for Governor that doesn’t think an exception to abortion should be available for rape or incest?

You can continue to point to your single issue polls but that’s not how elections are decided. Voters clearly prefer candidates that offer them abortion without restrictions and tax and spend policies vs what the opposition offers.

The complaints from the left around “systemic” anything seems to really land with Democrats and there are a lot of those in Chicago.

Last edited 10 months ago by PPF
Where's Mine ???
10 months ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Pathetically, so few vote (20% turnout?) and of those that do vote so many have skin in the $game$.

PPF
10 months ago

Not voting is also a decision. Those people have decided that it doesn’t matter who is elected and they would rather leave it up to the smaller percentage of people that actually vote. In essence, they have provided their vote by proxy, no different than shareholders of a stock. The people that vote clearly like what they are getting.

mqyl
10 months ago
Reply to  PPF

Yes, those who don’t vote are essentially saying they don’t care who gets elected. They shouldn’t complain when they see these elected officials make boneheaded decisions adversely affecting the populace.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE