In a rank choice voting system, also known as instant runoff voting, if one candidate wins at least 50% of the vote, they are declared the winner. In the event that there isn’t a majority, the last-place candidate is dropped, and the votes for that person would be automatically redistributed to the voter’s second choice. This process repeats until one of the candidates ends up with the majority.
Elaborate Pokerino. I wonder about Evanston. It’s like they’re trying to win the race to the looney bin with Oak Park.
Truth Seeker
3 years ago
What the hell is in the drinking water in Evanston??
Being Had
3 years ago
One vote for each registered Evanston voter who votes. The proposal is illegal and should stay that way.
I assume those who initiated the discussion want to avoid the cost of the run-off election. Then they came-up with presumptive ideas about how the same set of voters in the primary would vote in a run-off election. They should have called pretending what it is and discarded the ideas.
When reading the article I fell-off the cliff when the Ralph Nader example from 2000 was reported. But, there sure are other places to fall-off.
Frank James
3 years ago
How is this even remotely legal?
Zephyr Window
3 years ago
There should be no political party affiliation when voting. Vote for the most qualified and any reference made to a political party while campaigning would immediately disqualify a candidate. That would shake things up.
Elaborate Pokerino. I wonder about Evanston. It’s like they’re trying to win the race to the looney bin with Oak Park.
What the hell is in the drinking water in Evanston??
One vote for each registered Evanston voter who votes. The proposal is illegal and should stay that way.
I assume those who initiated the discussion want to avoid the cost of the run-off election. Then they came-up with presumptive ideas about how the same set of voters in the primary would vote in a run-off election. They should have called pretending what it is and discarded the ideas.
When reading the article I fell-off the cliff when the Ralph Nader example from 2000 was reported. But, there sure are other places to fall-off.
How is this even remotely legal?
There should be no political party affiliation when voting. Vote for the most qualified and any reference made to a political party while campaigning would immediately disqualify a candidate. That would shake things up.
Completely agree. Why pull separate ballots, make it all one and done, its ridiculous (especially in IL, of course).