Fed appeals court: No order needed to bar Pritzker from again attempting to shut down religious services – Cook County Record

“… In addition to stressing that an injunction is a discretionary remedy, which new developments may make unnecessary (if not imprudent), we observed that the Governor likely will take account of legal developments when issuing any new orders. A federal court ought to give state officials the respect of predicting that they will accept and follow the Supreme Court’s analysis,” the judges wrote.
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
debtsor
4 years ago

Pritzker is setting dangerous precedents and future leaders will surely exploit. His position is that he doesn’t have to obey the constitution, and the only limits to his executive power is the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the constitution. He can do whatever he wants until such time, maybe weeks or months, or years, until the Supreme Court tells him no.

This is the definition of tyranny.

Last edited 4 years ago by debtsor

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE