“… In addition to stressing that an injunction is a discretionary remedy, which new developments may make unnecessary (if not imprudent), we observed that the Governor likely will take account of legal developments when issuing any new orders. A federal court ought to give state officials the respect of predicting that they will accept and follow the Supreme Court’s analysis,” the judges wrote.
Pritzker is setting dangerous precedents and future leaders will surely exploit. His position is that he doesn’t have to obey the constitution, and the only limits to his executive power is the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the constitution. He can do whatever he wants until such time, maybe weeks or months, or years, until the Supreme Court tells him no.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
Pritzker is setting dangerous precedents and future leaders will surely exploit. His position is that he doesn’t have to obey the constitution, and the only limits to his executive power is the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the constitution. He can do whatever he wants until such time, maybe weeks or months, or years, until the Supreme Court tells him no.
This is the definition of tyranny.