Home prices have been slow to rise for a decade. Here’s why that’s not all bad. – Crain’s

Comment: Some economist actually said this: “I don't think people would feel poor because they bought a house in Chicago ten years ago, and not in San Francisco,” where prices all but doubled during the decade, Lazzara said. The Chicago homeowner should feel rich, “because they can get so much more home for the money.”
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mqyl
6 years ago

As I said in an earlier comment, you’d have to buy a house in the Chicago area for $0 to avoid the purchase being a very negative financial investment over time. Even then, eventually it would be a negative investment, but at least the $0 purchase buys you some years of financial well being. Of course, the problem is that houses aren’t selling for $0 (yet).

Joe Blow
6 years ago

Things are affordable for a reason, I’m sure you are all smart enough to figure out why.

debtsor
6 years ago

I don’t to sound crude, but that ain’t yellow rain running down my leg.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE