Johnson OKs deal to raise tax on high-end home sales, use funds to combat homelessness – Chicago Sun-Times

Mayor Brandon Johnson has signed off on a compromise plan to raise the real estate transfer tax on home sales over $1 million to generate $100 million in annual revenue to combat homelessness, but in a way that will reduce the tax for homes sold for less than $1 million. Zoning Committee Chair Carlos Ramirez-Rosa predicted overwhelming voter approval. “People who are purchasing homes for the first time are likely spending less than $1 million, and they will now see a decrease. So effectively, we’re asking the average Chicagoan, ‘Do you want to pay less in real estate transfer taxes?’ I think voters will overwhelmingly say ‘yes,’ ” said Ramirez-Rosa.
17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fullbladder
2 years ago

No amount of money can ever satiate the Brandon Johnson’s of the world…there’s just not. Democrat voters are illiterate in their ability to understand politics; and history for that matter. There’s no example in history of their schemes and beliefs succeeding…none.

Bob
2 years ago

Yeah go Colorado like this fool where men are men and the sheep are nervous

Honest Jerk
2 years ago

I’m betting there simply aren’t many Chicago residents that read Wirepoints. Most already left, and the ones remaining probably have very well paid, non-transferrable skills/jobs. They will put up with just about anything the mayor throws at them.

Pat S.
2 years ago

Doesn’t the seller pay the transfer tax, not the buyer?

Last month we sold a Cook County property and WE paid the transfer taxes, not the buyer.

I’m confused – but most of what goes on in Cook County and Chicago perplexes me. Like not teaching kids to read, write and do math, instead emphasizing topics that do nothing for their job prospects … unless they decide to become activists.

nixit
2 years ago
Reply to  Pat S.

Chicago has a transfer tax on both the seller and buyer. The seller portion is relatively new and they use that money as a means to subsidize the CTA. Yes, the CTA.

https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/fin/supp_info/revenue/tax_list/real_property_transfertax.html

Where's Mine ???
2 years ago
Reply to  Pat S.

The Crains article is really good (https://www.chicagobusiness.com/politics/brandon-johnson-agrees-graduated-mansion-tax). Defines 3 TIERS for Transfer Tax: Those three tiers, as currently drafted:The transfer tax on property sales of under $1 million would be lowered to 0.60%.The transfer tax on property sales of between $1 million and $1.5 million would be set at 2%.The transfer tax on property sales of over $1.5 million would be raised to 3%, quadruple the current rate. And who pays new Transfer tax between Buyer/Seller: The transfer tax increases would only apply to the buyer side, with the exception of the first tier, which would apply to both buyers… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Where's Mine ???
Pat S.
2 years ago

Thanks for the clarification.

Equally or both buyer and seller pay the same tax (the city collects the full amount from both)? Guess it’s possible.

This is insidious.

Giddyap
2 years ago

A graduated tax on home sales may need approval in Springfield

https://www.illinoispolicy.org/lightfoot-asks-springfield-for-progressive-exit-tax-on-chicago-property-sales/

If Dems in General Assembly can approve that, they will use it as a springboard for a graduated income tax grab.

Last edited 2 years ago by Giddyap
Poor Taxpayer
2 years ago

The rich will exit at every opportunity. No one likes to be gouged, no one!!
Stupid move by government, but I guess that is what government is about.

nixit
2 years ago

LOL so Brandon “compromised” by upping the top percentage with a faux middle range.

• Properties sold for under $1 million that currently account for 94% of all sales will see a decrease in the real estate transaction tax owed. The new tax rate would be 0.60%, down from the current rate of 0.75% — a 20% cut.

• Sales of $1 million or over, but under $1.5 million, will pay a 2% tax — more than 21⁄2 times what they pay now.

• And sales of $1.5 million and higher will pay 3%, which is four times the current rate.

Old Spartan
2 years ago

I’m hitting you in the head with a hammer. Would you like me to start hitting you in the head with the hammer not quite so hard? Yes? I think most people getting hit in the head with a hammer will say ‘Yes’.

mqyl
2 years ago
  1. This “mansion tax” will reduce the tax on homes sold for less than $1M? By how much? 2. Yes, there will be overwhelming voter approval, but what happens when the $1M threshold starts decreasing along with housing prices increasing? Then, in not so many years from now, some of the same Chicagoans who voted for this can afford more expensive homes, and fjnd themselves on the receiving end of this huge tax increase. That’s called being shortsighted.
Old Joe
2 years ago
Reply to  mqyl

Spot on. The income tax started this way. In 1913 only the rich were gonna pay it…..

debtsor
2 years ago
Reply to  mqyl

We all know Brandon Johnson is, at his core, a virulent anti-white racist. The goal of new taxes is to drive out ‘rich’ yt out of the loop, north and west sides, to forever cement black and brown control over the city. Few of Brandon Johnson’s voters live, or work, in million dollar properties anyways, so what do they care! Sure, the nicest and wealthiest neighborhoods in the city will be destroyed, but what do his voters care? Chicago is a tale of two cities, so to speak, and their goal is to make it one big blighted city. They’ll… Read more »

debtsor
2 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

As if every policy he’s endorsed or imposed hasn’t had the singular goal of making life for the elite oppressor capitalist class even more difficult. He taxes your property, he insults your ancestors, he intentionally lets people with his color skin terrorize your neighborhood with violent crime… He doesn’t like white people, he wants them gone, and he’s happy to see them leave the city limits.

debtsor
2 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

I personally hate discussing race in this way, but, I have to recognize that my enemies DO see race, and see everything in terms of race, and it would be naive to take the racial component out of all of BJ’s actions.

Honest Jerk
2 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

At this point, the non-white people are welcome to have Chicago all to themselves provided they agree to never ask for Federal assistance. Let’s see how much they enjoy paying for their own short-sighted liberal, woke decisions.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE