Judge grants a partial temporary restraining order on National Guard deployment in Illinois – Chicago Sun-Times

“I simply cannot credit [the Trump administration’s] declarations to the extent they contradict state and local law enforcement,” Judge April Perry said. “[The Department of Homeland Security’s] perception of events [is] simply unreliable.” Perry pointed to other federal prosecutions or lawsuits in Chicago and said “in the last 48 hours, in four separate unrelated legal decisions from different neutral parties, they all cast significant doubt on DHS’ credibility and assessment of what is happening on the streets of Chicago.”
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marie
7 months ago

The ice agents and national guard are going in to agitate people and commiting violence against them in order to justify why they are there to yank people off of the streets. Trump is stirring up a ruckus to cause our nation to want to fight the administration!

Leaving Soon, just not soon enough
7 months ago

ICE Agents In Chicago Area Who Aren’t Undercover Must Wear Badges Or IDs, Federal Judge Rules

Frank Miller
7 months ago

“It would be a cold day in hell before I would consent to an uninvited, unilateral intervention into one of my cities” – Tom Ridge – Former Secretary, Department of Homeland Security

Last edited 7 months ago by Frank Miller
Ataraxis
7 months ago

I wish I was making this up, but the esteemed Judge Perry is a 2003 graduate of ……. wait for it…….. the Northwestern University PRITZKER School of Law! Too funny! Also really funny that girl boss Judge Perry believes that DHS’s perception of events is “simply unreliable”. Did it ever occur to the good Judge to maybe get in her car and take a ride to Broadview and see what’s going on? Or is it too déclassé for a Northwestern graduate to venture into a working class neighborhood with all those icky people she’s heard about but never talked to?… Read more »

Last edited 7 months ago by Ataraxis
Ataraxis
7 months ago
Reply to  Ataraxis

Judge Perry, thank you for the downvote!

Kwyjibo
7 months ago

The article starts with the question of believing local law enforcement, who say they have the situation under control? or Trump?

Did she not see the lawsuit from the media against DHS on the excessive force? How could that be possible if the local law enforcment has it under control>

The Railroader
7 months ago

Because of course they did. This leftist tyranny of the judiciary has been slapped down how many times now? Overturn in 3…2…

Lurker
7 months ago

Perry was a Kim Foxx stooge, appointed as a DEI GirlBoss hire by Biden. Hopefully the 7th Circuit or SCOTUS will slap this nonsense down.

When federal agents are being assaulted with cars — and Chicago police are on the side of the attackers — the only answer for law and order is the Guard.

Last edited 7 months ago by Lurker
Admin
7 months ago
Reply to  Lurker

True. I don’t know the proper legal outcome on appeal, but I am pretty sure April Perry’s opinion will not carry much weight.

JackBolly
7 months ago

No concern by this ‘judge’ in her kangaroo court for international terrorists putting bounties on Federal Law enforment officers. We’ll see how far her freak show goes.

Fed Up Taxpayer
7 months ago

Just another gift from Biden that we will be paying for in the foreseeable future. Let her take a walk downtown tonight and see if that changes her opinion. You would have to live under a rock to think Chicago is safe.

Brian Jones
7 months ago

I think it’s fine, and I work on the southwest side and drive up Pulaski every day. No problems. Lived in and by Chicago for over 30 years now. Helps that I get my news from multiple sources, and not just hopelessly partisan ones.

Fed Up Taxpayer
7 months ago
Reply to  Brian Jones

Go to U of Chicago hospital. Walk on Adams, Michigan or State after dark. People are getting randomly slugged walking from the trains (saw this happen). You are driving in the morning with rush hour with your car locked. Get informed so you aren’t a statistic.

Ataraxis
7 months ago

He gives his whole game away when he says he lives on the southwest side.
Why did he choose the southwest side and not the west side off the Eisenhower?
He obviously could have bought a cheaper house on the west side.
Why didn’t he buy a cheaper house in Austin to save himself some money?
Further, if he’s safe in his car driving up Pulaski, wouldn’t he also be safe driving in his car in Austin if he lived there?

Matt J.
7 months ago

I live in the city, a short walk from the loop. and I work in the loop. My wife regularly walks our dog on Michigan Ave after dark. Your portrayal of Chicago suggests you live in the suburbs and don’t visit Chicago too often. This is not to say Chicago is not w/o it’s problems (it has many, as typically well-covered here), but your opinion will be more valuable if you gather accurate data.

Last edited 7 months ago by Matt J.
Matt J.
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt J.

Yup, some here in the echo chamber are voting down facts.

Anna
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt J.

Accurate data? Aren’t you the guy who posted a Texas for profit business group claiming it was the SBA??!!
Do you know what projection is?

Fed Up Taxpayer
7 months ago
Reply to  Matt J.
Ron Wood
7 months ago
Reply to  Brian Jones

I lived just outside the city for 60 years and commuted to and from the Loop via the Blue and Green lines for 25+ years. Riding the CTA gives you a much different perspective than riding in your personal vehicle. My job is remote these days, so I no longer have to take public transportation for which I’m thankful.

Riding the CTA became noticeably less safe around the time Daley 2.0 stepped down and funding really dried up and got progressively worse as time passed. There’s a lot of crime on the CTA…

The Railroader
7 months ago
Reply to  Ron Wood

The funding dried up? The CTA spends more now than at any time in its history. All while ridership peaked in 2012 and declined from there ever since.

Ron Wood
7 months ago
Reply to  The Railroader

CTA funding didn’t dry up, but city finances in general got tighter due to a number of factors and police presence noticeably thinned out over time.

Immediately post 9/11 there was a strong and visible police presence on CTA trains and stops along with private K9 units. As time passed, those resources dried up, and visible police presence became much, much less frequent and/or visible. One felt much safer riding public transportation circa 2003 than post 2010. Things changed a lot in that time.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE