Griffin told Pritzker he had a rare opportunity to run the state not from the political left but the center, dealing with unaffordable pension costs, such as a 3% compound annual cost-of-living increase for retirees, while stabilizing state finances with additional revenues, the Griffin account goes. “If you do these things, I certainly won’t get in your way and in fact will support you,” Griffin told Pritzker in so many words. In other words, Griffin urged Pritzker to make pension changes that could result in the governor getting some political cover from his rightward flank for a companion tax hike. Team Pritzker says that wasn’t the case, that there was no quid pro quo offer. Pritzker wouldn’t even consider engaging in “a backroom deal with wealthy people who want the laws to benefit them at the expense of working families,” says a spokeswoman
LMAO: “Pritzker wouldn’t even consider engaging in ‘a backroom deal with wealthy people who want the laws to benefit them at the expense of working families,’ says a spokeswoman.” This is literally Pritzker, himself, every-day, every-meeting, every-decision. He is a trust fund tyrant and a corrupt oligarch who has only further perpetuated the state’s demise. And the entire Illinois press class has supported and enabled him every step of the way.
debtsor
3 years ago
Pritzker is a repulsive human being, full of gluttony and avarice, and sacrifices to his only god, Moloch.
Last edited 3 years ago by debtsor
Lion's Choice
3 years ago
If This Is True, That Means Pritzker Chose Left Wing Agenda/Crooked Unions Over State’s Fiscal Health
Duh. Of course that’s what Pritzker chose. Every Democrat state and local office holder for the past 30 years has made that same perverted decision. AFSCME, SEIU, IFT, CTU pay their politicians gobs of money and expect results in return.
This story doesn’t seem right to me. I have to think Griffin is smart enough to know that new hires are not an issue, so he would not be asking for something addressing them.. They have already been taken care of under Tier 2, which is a very bad deal for them. Nor would you need a constitutional amendment to change the deal further for new hires.
My lifelong teacher friend has a son who is a teacher. He moved to Illinois because his prior state, Florida, where he was an assistant superintendent for literacy for a county in his late 20’s, wasn’t progressive enough. So he moved to Illinois (admittedly to a great school district) to teach 6th grade. His mother, one of the 100k pension recipients, told him that Tier 2 was a lousy deal and explained how much he was giving up by moving to Illinois. His response was that the legislature would enhance the deal at some point to be like his mother’s.… Read more »
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
LMAO: “Pritzker wouldn’t even consider engaging in ‘a backroom deal with wealthy people who want the laws to benefit them at the expense of working families,’ says a spokeswoman.”
This is literally Pritzker, himself, every-day, every-meeting, every-decision. He is a trust fund tyrant and a corrupt oligarch who has only further perpetuated the state’s demise. And the
entire Illinois press class has supported and enabled him every step of the way.
Pritzker is a repulsive human being, full of gluttony and avarice, and sacrifices to his only god, Moloch.
If This Is True, That Means Pritzker Chose Left Wing Agenda/Crooked Unions Over State’s Fiscal Health
Duh. Of course that’s what Pritzker chose. Every Democrat state and local office holder for the past 30 years has made that same perverted decision. AFSCME, SEIU, IFT, CTU pay their politicians gobs of money and expect results in return.
I would call it a RACKET!!
Dude, wake up. That is exactly what is happening and has been happening for a while.
And the strain of Dem in this state doesn’t ever deal in good faith. Ever.
This story doesn’t seem right to me. I have to think Griffin is smart enough to know that new hires are not an issue, so he would not be asking for something addressing them.. They have already been taken care of under Tier 2, which is a very bad deal for them. Nor would you need a constitutional amendment to change the deal further for new hires.
But Tier 2 benefits can be enhanced at any time. Their playbook is to re-amortize the debt first, then hide the enhancements in the new payment plan.
My lifelong teacher friend has a son who is a teacher. He moved to Illinois because his prior state, Florida, where he was an assistant superintendent for literacy for a county in his late 20’s, wasn’t progressive enough. So he moved to Illinois (admittedly to a great school district) to teach 6th grade. His mother, one of the 100k pension recipients, told him that Tier 2 was a lousy deal and explained how much he was giving up by moving to Illinois. His response was that the legislature would enhance the deal at some point to be like his mother’s.… Read more »