The reparations are in return for the U. of C.’s role in displacing and destabilizing Black communities surrounding it, said organizer David Zegeye. Specifically, activists pointed to the school’s decision to indirectly fund racially restrictive covenants during the 1930s and 1940s to prevent integration of the mid-South Side and its role in orchestrating the later urban renewal plan that saw thousands of Black people displaced from Hyde Park.
Of course the wokesters running UIC will be more than happy to see the errors of their way and pay up. Additionally they will self-humiliate themselves for their sins. Not!
dmjdjdkj
4 years ago
Fixed the headline for you:
“Once Upon A Time, University Of Chicago Educated The Best And Brightest — Today, U Of C Churns Out Miseducated, Unemployable, WokeTards — U Of C Student Morons Demand That The School Pay $1B For Slavery Reparations”
You’re Welcome!
nixit
4 years ago
As far as reparations are concerned, they owe us so much we’d be lucky if we get a fraction of what they owe us
Remove UofC from Hyde Park and you’d have a nuclear landscape. The university is the only thing that kept that neighborhood from becoming West Garfield Park and Englewood 2.0 decades ago.
OTOH, anything that makes Hyde Park liberals uncomfortable is fun.
The Paraclete
4 years ago
The should talk to Brandon about reparations. He’s supporting Black History Month by giving out free crack pipes!
He’s got the connections to crack through his loving son.
#freeJoeRogan
4 years ago
Not that I advocate for U of C…. But, did they use eminent domain? Illegally discriminate in some way? Outright steal?
WeLL, in the absence if those, they l8ely exercised their free market right to, you know, buy land available for sale to support their business…. It’s called free market economy – maybe if you prioritized learning and education you would understand and have bought that land to sell to U of C.
So, while I agree with the idea that there is an argument requiring some kind of quid pro quo for tax exemption, my thesis is, even with a spelling error or two, irrefutable. The university owes no resident for gentrification that may have happened as the area became more desirable and safer and nicer, etc. ad inifinitum.
The Paraclete
4 years ago
The shakedown season traditionally starts on Valentine’s Day. Considering how many shtbgs came from UC, it’s delicious!
debtsor
4 years ago
““UChicago has a history of gentrifying the surrounding South Side area from Hyde Park to Woodlawn, all the way over to Washington Park and displacing long-term residents.”
I stopped reading the article about this time because the people today who are complaining that long term residents were displaced are the same people in the 1950’s and 1960’s displaced the previous generation of long term residents. Displacement goes both ways, folks.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
What would Milton Friedman think?
Of course the wokesters running UIC will be more than happy to see the errors of their way and pay up. Additionally they will self-humiliate themselves for their sins. Not!
Fixed the headline for you:
“Once Upon A Time, University Of Chicago Educated The Best And Brightest — Today, U Of C Churns Out Miseducated, Unemployable, WokeTards — U Of C Student Morons Demand That The School Pay $1B For Slavery Reparations”
You’re Welcome!
Remove UofC from Hyde Park and you’d have a nuclear landscape. The university is the only thing that kept that neighborhood from becoming West Garfield Park and Englewood 2.0 decades ago.
OTOH, anything that makes Hyde Park liberals uncomfortable is fun.
The should talk to Brandon about reparations. He’s supporting Black History Month by giving out free crack pipes!
That’s nothing, next he’ll be giving out free crack.
He’s got the connections to crack through his loving son.
Not that I advocate for U of C…. But, did they use eminent domain? Illegally discriminate in some way? Outright steal?
WeLL, in the absence if those, they l8ely exercised their free market right to, you know, buy land available for sale to support their business…. It’s called free market economy – maybe if you prioritized learning and education you would understand and have bought that land to sell to U of C.
Maybe if they had been paying real estate taxes over the decades I would agree with you.
So, while I agree with the idea that there is an argument requiring some kind of quid pro quo for tax exemption, my thesis is, even with a spelling error or two, irrefutable. The university owes no resident for gentrification that may have happened as the area became more desirable and safer and nicer, etc. ad inifinitum.
The shakedown season traditionally starts on Valentine’s Day. Considering how many shtbgs came from UC, it’s delicious!
““UChicago has a history of gentrifying the surrounding South Side area from Hyde Park to Woodlawn, all the way over to Washington Park and displacing long-term residents.”
I stopped reading the article about this time because the people today who are complaining that long term residents were displaced are the same people in the 1950’s and 1960’s displaced the previous generation of long term residents. Displacement goes both ways, folks.
They lost me at Washington Park. I’d wager at least one-third of lots in that neighborhood are vacant. 56th and Lafayette in not exactly mansion row.