By: Mark Glennon*
You probably hear often that Illinois pays more to the federal government than it gets back. That’s often reinforced by Illinois politicians and progressive commentators who like to ask for help or deflect blame because the state is a net “giver” or “donor” – that its people and businesses hand more to the federal government than comes back to the state in federal spending.
But it’s not true. Illinois is a taker, not a giver. Studies show that Illinois’ balance of payments with the federal government has been positive for at least a couple years, a reversal from years past. And the newest studies show that the positive balance of payments is growing compared to other states. Illinois is more of a taker than ever before.
The Rockefeller Institute and the Comptroller of the State of New York recently released their annual studies of the balance of payments between states and the federal government. They are the only regular studies on the subject and the most cited. They tally up all taxes and other payments made by residents of each state and compare that to the total that comes back to the state through grants, contract payments, military spending, social programs and everything else. Their new work covers 2020, the latest year for which the data are available.
That was an exceptional year, however, because the gusher of federal “pandemic relief” started that year, making all states net takers for the first time on record. Nevertheless, the results for 2020 and the trend from previous years is clear from both studies: Illinois increasingly gets back more from the federal government than it sends in.
Here is what the two new studies found:
The Rockefeller Institute found that Illinois had a positive per capita balance of payments with the federal government of $6,604 in 2020. That ranked Illinois 43rd highest among other states for a surplus, up from 41st in 2019. In other words, Illinois became a bit more of a taker state in 2020. Rockefeller’s chart of other states for 2020 is shown in its interactive graphic here.
Looking at those numbers from another way, Rockefeller says Illinois got back $84 billion more from the federal government than it put in. That’s $1.64 from the federal government for every dollar put in.
Rockefeller also provides a six-year total. Illinois’ positive balance of payments in 2019 and 2020 more than exceeded total negatives for the previous four years. On average, over the six years, Illinoisans got $864 more back from the federal government than they put in.
Finally, and most importantly, Rockefeller did the same per capital analysis without including COVID relief money. It found that Illinois was still a net taker, with a $1,950 positive balance of payments per person.
The New York Comptroller study is less comprehensive but reached very similar results for 2020. It also showed all states getting back more money from the federal government than they received in 2020.
It found that Illinois’ per capita balance of payments surplus with the federal government was $6,321 in 2020, giving it 45th highest surplus compared to other states. That meant a total surplus of $80 billion for Illinois. All those numbers are very close to Rockefeller’s findings. However, the New York Comptroller’s numbers have differed somewhat from Rockefeller’s numbers in earlier years. It showed Illinois with a small per capita surplus of $883 in 2019. But a close look behind the numbers, which we did in 2020, had already indicated clearly that Illinois had become a taker state.
Two important observations are in order.
First, the numbers don’t actually mean anything strictly in terms of fairness among states, despite persistent, hypocritical claims by progressives to the contrary. That’s because the biggest reason why some states send more to Washington is progressive federal tax rates.
Big earners pay more in taxes at higher rates, so richer states like Illinois, New York and Connecticut naturally pay in much more to the federal government. “A state that has a disproportionately large percentage of high-income earners (such as New York) will inherently pay more in Federal personal income taxes,” as the Rockefeller study says.
Yet it has been progressives in progressive states who routinely complain that they are “donors.” Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Comptroller Susana Mendoza and Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot have been among the complainers, which we wrote about earlier. If it were true that Illinois was getting shorted, what they were actually complaining about is progressive tax rates; they were asking for the higher taxes paid by the rich to be returned to the state. Now, it turns out that their premise isn’t even true.
Second, the trend toward Illinois taking back more than it sends to Washington is no surprise because Illinois’ tax base is fleeing.
Just look at the latest migration numbers from the Internal Revenue Service that we reported last week. Illinois lost, on net, another 101,000 taxpayers and their dependents to other states in 2020 alone, losing a net $8.5 billion in taxable income (AGI) to other states in 2020 – a new record. That was the third-worst performance in the country.
And it’s higher earners who are fleeing. The Illinoisans who fled in 2020 earned, on average, $30,600 more than the residents Illinois gained from other states. Outgoing residents earned $106,000, while incoming residents made just $75,000. That’s the biggest gap since at least 2000 and a continuation of a growing trend.
Without radical reforms, the trend will continue. Illinois will become poorer relative to other states and increasingly dependent on federal handouts.
*Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints
Related columns from Wirepoints:
- Illinois Is Not Growing: A Comprehensive Look At Recent Claims To The Contrary
- Bleeding people: New IRS migration data shows Illinois lost another 100,000 residents and a record amount of wealth in
- New 2020 IRS migration data reveals Florida is the biggest winner, New York is the biggest loser, in the competition for people and their wealth – A Wirepoints 50-state survey
- What federal government gave to Illinois in lower interest cost from credit upgrades it has already taken away
- Juiced Up Budgets In Other States Attributed To Federal Aid, But Pritzker Claims Credit In Illinois
The bill passed despite their votes in response to certain incidents where local prosecutors are thought to have been too lenient with non-citizens assaulting cops.
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board cited Wirepoints’ analysis of Chicago student proficiency data in their latest piece condemning the Chicago Teachers Union’s outrageous contract demands…all while a vast majority of Chicago’s children graduate unable to read at grade level.
Ted joined Tom Miller of WJPF to talk about the details of Gov. Pritzker’s proposed $52 billion budget, why the state is struggling now that federal covid dollars have run out, the controversy surrounding Tier 2 government pensions, why Illinois’ expensive education system fails to teach children to read, the outrageous demands of the Chicago Teachers Union, and more.
Ted joined Jeff Daly to discuss how politicians can never spend enough on education despite there being no accountability for that spending, the growth of education staffing across Illinois, Mayor Brandon Johnson’s $1 billion demand for Chicago schools, why Gov. Pritzker is providing $830 million in taxpayer subsidies to struggling EV carmaker Rivian, and more.
The federal giver/taker argument is not a valid argument to even have in the first. Of course some red states ‘take’ more because the federal government owns most of the land there including military bases and BLM (Bureau of Land Management, silly!) protected land. And of course, social security checks are included in that ‘take’ so Florida retirees are considered takers even though they were considered givers when they lived in New England. It’s a stupid argument to be had.
Debtsor, all true. And if you look behind the components of the balance the big item is income tax dollars which, as I said, skews the deficit to wealthier states.
Well, an interesting aspect is the size of our state economy and that a state that is so large needs any Fed dollars at all… Fifth largest GDP in the country… And we are not self sufficient… (To your point, there are ways the data could be scaled to ensure an apples to apples comparison, but it would take time and not reinforce the “narrative”…
My comment from 2020 still stands: Folks like to paint this argument as a red-blue thing. They will say downstate red counties are “takers” while blue Cook County is a giver. But they conveniently leave out all the blue “takers” within Cook County. Takers like Harvey are subsidized by givers like Tinley Park. River Forest residents prop up Maywood and Bellwood. Palos Heights keeps Robbins afloat. Oak Park keeps Cicero from tanking. Hell, I’d wager each town in DuPage County is a giver, propping up some of the universities all on their own. Is the argument to keep all our… Read more »
Along these same lines, I once read that if the southern third of IL became its own state, it would be the poorest state in the union, so they are most definitely a taker,
There was a newspaper article on this general topic maybe 4-5 months ago, but I can’t recall whether it focused on state taxes paid or federal taxes paid per county as compared to dollars received by that same governmental entity. I can very roughly summarize it but far from exactly so. Anyway, suffice it to say that that Chicago’s suburbs northern, northwestern and western suburbs “lose” most of their tax dollars as compared to dollars received by the same governmental level. The same applies to a lesser degree to northern IL in general and the “takers” start to become obvous… Read more »
Without a doubt, but I don’t appreciate the politicos lumping my upper middle class Cook County suburb with all the other dead weight ones within the county. This is how the local Dems like to spin things, as if Cook County is supporting the whole state. No, Cook County’s wealthy suburbs are supporting the state.
Residents of Ford Heights doesn’t get to claim “giver” status.
“Cook County’s wealthy suburbs are supporting the state.”
Both financially and politically too. Win the suburbs and win all statewide offices.
But our suburbanites seem more than happy with their progressive representation throughout the state.