Pritzker progressive tax must be use to fund Illinois pensions – Opinion – Crain’s

Comment: This one is so particularly foolish it needs a full article in response.
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
world with end
7 years ago

So, in IL, the pols want a constitutional amendment to raise taxes but not to lower pensions and health care benefits. That’s absolute insanity, of course, because: 1) IL residents already pay the highest combination of property and sales taxes in the country; 2) even if a constitutional amendment cut pensions and health care benefits in half, state retirees would have better retirement packages than most American retirees; and 3) higher taxes will cause even more people to move out of IL, lessening the expected increase in revenue. Doesn’t this writer understand the concept of a death spiral?

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE