Pritzker’s planned reduction of local government distribution rate raises flags – Center Square

At less than 6.5 percent now, the local share percentage has dropped nearly 40 percent over the past decade. “You’re not even at the amount you’re supposed to be already, so now you’re going to cut $60 million? He cut gaming last year from local governments, the grocery (tax revenues),” House Republican Leader Tony McCombie said.
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Deb
3 months ago

Pritzker is running out of money to fund illegals. So he has to steal money from local governments. He could stop all the fraud in this state, but won’t.

Last edited 3 months ago by Deb
Bear19
3 months ago

Start eliminating if you can’t fund it. Start with township government, start consolidating into one local branch instead of four, township ,state, county and city jurisdictions . I know it will never happen but it’s a starting point, redundancy is like stupidly in this state

David F
3 months ago
Reply to  Bear19

Consolidation of schools would be a HUGE cost reduction.
If your district only has 2 or 3 schools and you can hit the other districts with 2 or 3 with a slingshot, they need to be combined.
The state needs to FORCE school consolidation or cut funding until they do!
Many townships should just be eliminated, if 65% of you township is towns/cities it needs to go!

James
3 months ago
Reply to  David F

When school districts are consolidated the general end result is that teachers in districts having lower pay scales are then paid the same salaries as the teachers who were employed in the formerly highest pay scale district. Your hope otherwise seldom applies.

ProzacPlease
3 months ago
Reply to  James

Hey, if having more districts doesn’t cost any more, why not make each school its own district? After all, there are no cost savings from fewer districts. Seriously?

James
3 months ago
Reply to  ProzacPlease

In my earlier posting I forgot to mention that in many—maybe even most—such school district consolidations the newly unemployed former superintendents tend to be first choices for other admin jobs in the newer consolidated districts. Want to guess their pay levels in these new jobs? Hint: One or more will now have “Asst. Superintendent” as their new title. How many assistants does the new Superintendent need? Hint #2: How many such people are not retiring and need a new job? Take a more educated guess now as to the resulting tax dollars saved as a result.

ProzacPlease
3 months ago
Reply to  James

Gosh, I would think the unions would be falling all over themselves in support of consolidation. It’s apparently the best path to union members getting higher pay. One district for all of Illinois! Can’t wait to hear unions take up that position.

ProzacPlease
3 months ago
Reply to  James

Guvna? Guvna? Cleanup needed on aisle 1.

daskoterzar
3 months ago
Reply to  James

So, you can see no cost reduction, no efficiency gains, no staff reduction in consolidating the 852 separate school districts in Illinois? The highest number of School Districts in the nation.

James
3 months ago
Reply to  daskoterzar

There may well be some savings here and there, but overall the result is nowhere near as sizable as many might presume. It’s a bit like taking your car into the dealer for what you think is a small issue only to be told it’s a big-buck bill you’re having to pay. Life is like that from time to time.

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE