Former 43rd Ward Ald. Michele Smith wrote in an email to her neighbors, “First, this amendment would tie the hands of our legislatures to make even the smallest changes on employment issues..."
IL/Chicago politicians—will not even discuss key issues which must be fixed (ie public sector pensions/remuneration; fiscal condition (bond ratings!); political corruption; crime; schools; political mismanagement and malfeasance (ie actual key process governance); –and of course they are “owned” by the public unions. So not only won’t they talk about this stuff, or of course do anything about it, they instead slap non-public union taxpayers in the face with Amendment 1…(and of course the un-SafeT Act). Audacious and condescending to the max, and of course a 180 from their oaths of office, to be fiduciaries for all citizens of the state,… Read more »
NB
3 years ago
just like rahm, smith can be honest with taxpayer/voters now that she’s retiring and not getting any more pay-to-play $ from public sec unions
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
IL/Chicago politicians—will not even discuss key issues which must be fixed (ie public sector pensions/remuneration; fiscal condition (bond ratings!); political corruption; crime; schools; political mismanagement and malfeasance (ie actual key process governance); –and of course they are “owned” by the public unions. So not only won’t they talk about this stuff, or of course do anything about it, they instead slap non-public union taxpayers in the face with Amendment 1…(and of course the un-SafeT Act). Audacious and condescending to the max, and of course a 180 from their oaths of office, to be fiduciaries for all citizens of the state,… Read more »
just like rahm, smith can be honest with taxpayer/voters now that she’s retiring and not getting any more pay-to-play $ from public sec unions