The good news is there are textbook approaches available to guide the design of this needed tax reform that would simultaneously eliminate the structural deficit and more fairly impose tax burden on people. The bad news is it’s always difficult to generate the political will required to get tax reform, no matter how needed, passed into law.
US Congress needs to. start working on the state bankruptcy laws, it’s impossible to dig this state out.
Call my shrink
7 months ago
Trump -caused fiscal crisis. So he’s the one who is raing taxes to pay for the overblown pension crisis and over spending in Illinois. Now I get it .
Tommy Paine
7 months ago
I can tell you what Ralph will say without reading the article. He’s going to say that “adjusting for inflation that spending is less now than it was how many years ago”. He will also mention that there is a structural deficit and that the only way out of it is to increase taxes via a progressive tax rate and to tax services. He will tell you that pensions and debt are the sacred cows. Ralph conveniently cherry picks the use of adjusting for inflation to “prove” his point. What he doesn’t do is compare spending using per capita data… Read more »
Isn’t Illinois Fun?
7 months ago
Martire has carved out a nice lucrative niche for himself via pension donations. His trail of negative influence at D90 in River Forest and D200 in Oak Park is well documented locally. Cushy university job and has become a self styled go to for tax “analysis”, none of which includes a rational business like approach to managing finite resources because to him they are infinite, the public being the ATM.
If Illinois is unable or unwilling to cut spending, the only choice is increasing taxes. Martire claims that spending isn’t too high and demand for services makes it necessary to not cut spending. At least he is being honest that we need more taxes if we want all this spending. It would be nice if a Republican candidate for governor outlined where the spending cuts would come from in order for taxes to not increase. Then the voters would have an actual choice on fiscal responsibility. Better to be honest than just spending with no way to pay for it… Read more »
You keep insisting this is a binary choice. Cut spending or increase taxes.
Won’t it be funny when a third choice is introduced into the mix? Probably by the current union members who want to keep the money flowing into their own pockets and not diverted to pay for pensions.
Those are the only two choices. Trying to find a legal way to cut pensions or bondholders is still cutting spending. The problem is you and others want to focus on the legally protected spending and want to ignore all the other spending. There doesn’t appear to be any political will to do this to Chicago and you will then still need to overcome all the legal hurdles. Good luck with that. In the meantime, you can raise taxes or cut unprotected spending or do a combination of both. Pensions and debt are protected. You can dream and fantasize all… Read more »
It won’t be me telling you about other choices. It will be the current public employees who want to make sure they get theirs, just like their forebears did. And they won’t worry about changing laws to do it.
Do you think they will care at all about your earnest entreaties? When have any of them ever cared about anything beyond their own paychecks?
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
US Congress needs to. start working on the state bankruptcy laws, it’s impossible to dig this state out.
Trump -caused fiscal crisis. So he’s the one who is raing taxes to pay for the overblown pension crisis and over spending in Illinois. Now I get it .
I can tell you what Ralph will say without reading the article. He’s going to say that “adjusting for inflation that spending is less now than it was how many years ago”. He will also mention that there is a structural deficit and that the only way out of it is to increase taxes via a progressive tax rate and to tax services. He will tell you that pensions and debt are the sacred cows. Ralph conveniently cherry picks the use of adjusting for inflation to “prove” his point. What he doesn’t do is compare spending using per capita data… Read more »
Martire has carved out a nice lucrative niche for himself via pension donations. His trail of negative influence at D90 in River Forest and D200 in Oak Park is well documented locally. Cushy university job and has become a self styled go to for tax “analysis”, none of which includes a rational business like approach to managing finite resources because to him they are infinite, the public being the ATM.
When Martire says “tax reform” read that as “tax increases.
If Illinois is unable or unwilling to cut spending, the only choice is increasing taxes. Martire claims that spending isn’t too high and demand for services makes it necessary to not cut spending. At least he is being honest that we need more taxes if we want all this spending. It would be nice if a Republican candidate for governor outlined where the spending cuts would come from in order for taxes to not increase. Then the voters would have an actual choice on fiscal responsibility. Better to be honest than just spending with no way to pay for it… Read more »
You keep insisting this is a binary choice. Cut spending or increase taxes.
Won’t it be funny when a third choice is introduced into the mix? Probably by the current union members who want to keep the money flowing into their own pockets and not diverted to pay for pensions.
Those are the only two choices. Trying to find a legal way to cut pensions or bondholders is still cutting spending. The problem is you and others want to focus on the legally protected spending and want to ignore all the other spending. There doesn’t appear to be any political will to do this to Chicago and you will then still need to overcome all the legal hurdles. Good luck with that. In the meantime, you can raise taxes or cut unprotected spending or do a combination of both. Pensions and debt are protected. You can dream and fantasize all… Read more »
It won’t be me telling you about other choices. It will be the current public employees who want to make sure they get theirs, just like their forebears did. And they won’t worry about changing laws to do it.
Do you think they will care at all about your earnest entreaties? When have any of them ever cared about anything beyond their own paychecks?
Yes, we will watch to see what happens.