SAFE-T Act earns support from local leaders after amendment – Beverly Review

“I voted against the SAFE-T Act when it passed nearly two years ago,,” state Sen. Bill Cunningham said. “These latest changes make the law more workable for officers on the street. The changes to the bill make our communities safer and give law enforcement more clarity."
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
nixit
3 years ago

Whether the likes of Democrats like Bill Cunningham vote yes or no is not based on the content of the bill inasmuch as how many votes are needed. Bill was able to vote no initially because the IL Senate Dems had enough yes votes for it to pass. Likewise, he was able to vote yes this time around, allowing any senators connected to SJW interests to vote no.

This is what a super-majority affords Illinois Democrats. The moderate ones or the ones who have Republican challengers are able to vote against party lines without actually changing the outcome.

Last edited 3 years ago by nixit

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE