Sham panacea of progressive income tax starts getting exposed – Quicktake

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rick
8 years ago

Wouldn’t a progressive tax include retirees? Or would they exempt a retired school admin who happens to have a $200,000 pension?

bruce
8 years ago

why do they always start with the supposed answer – taxes? Let’s start with what the bills are and how much do these idiots need. As stated below, yeah let’s calculate everything it would take. What? Maybe $45B per year to pay for everything and some reasonable way to pay the unfunded pensions? $50B? Then let’s use that number and derive a progressive rate. We know about how many people make how much…what’s the result? Maybe even throw in 1% cap on property taxes to see what the State should really pay to drive down property taxes. Tax services, tax… Read more »

Jeff+Carter
8 years ago

I think that if we are going to have a Democratic governor in Illinois it should be Dan Biss. He is a crackpot. I want him to put the transaction tax on the finance industry, and load up Illinois with taxes, user fees and socialism. Let’s get it over with.

nixit
8 years ago

I’ve seen Martire’s tax plan mentioned here. The effective tax rate on $200K would put us in the highest 10 states nationwide, higher than NY and CT. At $500K, we’re in the top 5. Since Martire’s plan doesn’t have a separate bracket for married filing jointly like most states, it’s hard to determine the actual household impact. If there’s only one bracket, it’s a lot worse. But the argument for a progressive income tax always forgets one important point: property tax. We’ve been told for decades that our property taxes are high because income taxes are low. Per Wallethub, here’s… Read more »

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE