Two suggestion from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning: First, state should re-examine its criteria for disbursing revenue to communities. Criteria should take into account things like infrastructure condition and the cost of service delivery, not just population and retail sales. Second, the county’s property tax classification system forces businesses to shoulder a higher share of the tax burden. By phasing out the property tax classification system over several years,Cook County could reduce the commercial/industrial tax differential, encouraging new business investment that will rebuild local tax revenue.
No mention in that article about changing the assessment system itself. If I can’t be certain that my taxes won’t double over the course of 1 year, I have to automatically assume they will given the financial state of IL. Those who own will always be forced to pay whatever they tell you to pay — appeals are no guarantee. And if you don’t you lose your home. It’s like paying off the mafia for “protection”.
debtsor
6 years ago
All that will happen is that R suburbs (NW/SW) will get less money and D suburbs (Everywhere else) will share in the spoils of stealing it from the R suburbs. No thank you.
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
No mention in that article about changing the assessment system itself. If I can’t be certain that my taxes won’t double over the course of 1 year, I have to automatically assume they will given the financial state of IL. Those who own will always be forced to pay whatever they tell you to pay — appeals are no guarantee. And if you don’t you lose your home. It’s like paying off the mafia for “protection”.
All that will happen is that R suburbs (NW/SW) will get less money and D suburbs (Everywhere else) will share in the spoils of stealing it from the R suburbs. No thank you.