Despite a lukewarm reception, the mayor and his supporters are hoping the idea catches on as neighborhoods take more ownership in efforts to stop the violence from continuing.
How can residents reclaim their neighborhoods?
Can they patrol the streets and arrest lawbreakers? Can they ensure that repeat offenders are prosecuted and removed from the streets?
Residents pay taxes for these services; they deserve to receive what they’re paying for. They also need a quality education to break the cycle of poverty. The “Invest in Kids” program was effective for impoverished children—so why didn’t the Mayor, a trained lobbyist, advocate for its renewal? Was it a decision influenced by his benefactors, possibly to avoid criticism from the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU)?
Hello, Indiana!
1 year ago
Some communities aren’t really all that opposed to crime. They, or family members ( of the close or extended varieties) make coin from it and, when a shooting involves the police that they clamor for yet turn on like snakes when they show up, is a golden opportunity for an non- contested payout. Crime DOES pay. The bodies stacking up like teenagers in a ‘80’s slasher movie are just part of the deal.
Brian Jones
1 year ago
Are they going to ride in cars with the gang members and physically stop them from shooting rivals? Otherwise, how are they going to convince them not to shoot?
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
How can residents reclaim their neighborhoods?
Can they patrol the streets and arrest lawbreakers? Can they ensure that repeat offenders are prosecuted and removed from the streets?
Residents pay taxes for these services; they deserve to receive what they’re paying for. They also need a quality education to break the cycle of poverty. The “Invest in Kids” program was effective for impoverished children—so why didn’t the Mayor, a trained lobbyist, advocate for its renewal? Was it a decision influenced by his benefactors, possibly to avoid criticism from the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU)?
Some communities aren’t really all that opposed to crime. They, or family members ( of the close or extended varieties) make coin from it and, when a shooting involves the police that they clamor for yet turn on like snakes when they show up, is a golden opportunity for an non- contested payout. Crime DOES pay. The bodies stacking up like teenagers in a ‘80’s slasher movie are just part of the deal.
Are they going to ride in cars with the gang members and physically stop them from shooting rivals? Otherwise, how are they going to convince them not to shoot?
The same way they convince them not to steal, use drugs, alcohol, carjack, mugging,
Rioting, go to school and learn.
Did I miss anything?