Editorial: Vote ‘no’ on Amendment One – Chicago Tribune*

"Individual workers would not be able to choose whether or not they wanted to be a dues-paying member of a union if one was bargaining for them at their workplace. And there, of course, lies the rub. Or one rub among many. That prohibition, potentially enshrined in the Illinois Constitution, conflicts with our rights as free Illinoisans to make those decisions for ourselves."
11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Paine's Ghost
3 years ago

Bust all unions especially public sector unions. Make Illinois a right to work state.

Vote Yes Amendment 1
3 years ago

Vote for a strong middle class by voting for the workers rights amendment. Tell corporate lackey’s like Tom that the middle class is stronger when unions are strong. Vote 4 workers rights. Vote YES on Amendment 1.

Mike
3 years ago

The union enslavement clause is part of Amendment One on the Tuesday November 8, 2022 ballot. Have a problem with an Illinois state constitutional enslavement of private sector workers (in union covered job positions) to the union plantation? Meaning the worker has no choice whether or not to pay the union. Even though Federal, state, and local government workers are exempt from such slavery? Contrast Illinois to Tennessee. Tennessee has a constitutional amendment on the ballot to do the opposite. That being, Tennessee has a constitutional amendment for Right to Work for private sector workers (in union covered positions) without… Read more »

Last edited 3 years ago by Mike
Vote Yes Amendment 1
3 years ago

The Workers Rights Amendment would prohibit Illinois from passing any state law (and any municipality from passing a local ordinance) “that interferes with, negates, or diminishes the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively over their wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment and workplace safety.” That means the Workers Rights Amendment would prohibit the passage of any so-called “right-to-work” laws in our state, which are designed to reduce workers’ rights and benefit big corporations. Neighboring states (Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin) with these laws have seen reduced hourly wages. Support a strong middle class. Vote yes for Amendment 1.… Read more »

Last edited 3 years ago by Vote Yes Amendment 1
Vote Yes Amendment 1
3 years ago

The workers rights amendment will keep workers and our communities safe by protecting their right to speak up about dangerous situations without fear of being fired. Unsafe construction, food safety issues, and dangerously low hospital staffing are threats to everyone when workers are afraid to report these conditions. Union strong members are not afraid to speak up and will fight for what’s right. Fair wages and safe working conditions.

Vote yes for amendment 1 and support the middle class. A strong middle class benefits everyone. Vote yes 4 workers.

NLRB
3 years ago

You don’t know what you’re talking about. That’s my job.

Last edited 3 years ago by NLRB
ProzacPlease
3 years ago

When even the Tribune is against it, your “vote yes 4 workers” mantra won’t cut it.

Mike
3 years ago

Workers can obviously speak up about unsafe working conditions right now, whether or not they belong to a union.

Community safety has nothing to do with Amendment One.

What is making communities unsafe is soft on crime legislators, chief judges, state’s attorneys, mayors, non-profits, lobbyists, activists, and radicals.

People are moving out of union power states, not into union power states.

nixit
3 years ago

“Individual workers would not be able to choose whether or not they wanted to be a dues-paying member of a union if one was bargaining for them at their workplace. 

Does this mean “freeloaders” (aren’t union members but are covered under the same CBA the union signed) are going to be forced to join a union? I know we talked about exclusive bargaining rights going kaput but I don’t know what that means for teachers who opted out of the union.

Mr Peabody's Boy Sherman
3 years ago
Reply to  nixit

Usually in situations like this those who chose not to join the union must pay an amount equivalent to the union dues to a charitable organization. The non union person would benefit from negotiations so an in kind payment is right. A school district or other entity will not and cannot bargain with each individual for every contract it would be a monumental task. As a side note when Wisconsin passed legislation that gave workers a choice to join the teachers union less than 10% did. It saved school districts millions of dollars.

Mike
3 years ago
Reply to  nixit

Any government worker (including public school teachers) at any level of government (Federal, state, and local government) can right now, and whether Amendment One on the November 8, 2022 Illinois statewide ballot passes or fails, can opt out of joining a union. What Amendment One does, regarding Right to Work, is place a ban on Right to Work for private sector workers in the Illinois state constitution. Meaning, private sector workers in a union covered job position in Illinois will continue to be forced to pay money to the union (union slaves). Amendment One has nothing to do with Right… Read more »

Last edited 3 years ago by Mike

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE