Federal Judge Enjoins Illinois Assault Weapons Ban – Jonathan Turley

The decision comes after two other district courts ruled in favor of the law — sending this issue to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court.  These long-awaited challenges that will test the Democratic calls for removing all AR-15s and similar weapons, including calls from President Joe Biden.
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Frank Miller
2 years ago

“A lot of people argue, this statute is unconstitutional. No, the statute is constitutional when applied to the subjects it was written for. For example, I’m arguing taxes are constitutional, but when applied to a subject they were not meant for, they become unconstitutional. Why? Because they violate due process. They violate the rights that are secured in your state and federal constitution. So don’t go in and argue that it’s unconstitutional, argue that it’s being misapplied to you. … So in other words if you have 6 legal entities in a definition, with the first one ‘person’, it can’t… Read more »

Trash Panda
2 years ago

Go on YouTube and watch the judicial committee hearings on biden appointments to the federal bench. The questioning is so revealing about a group of incompetent uber liberal candidates who simply refuse to answer questions and whose legal opinions are so far left that eventually we, the United States, will be a communist paradise as these people will decide the future. Of course they are unanimously approved and appointed by democrats who just don’t care.

debtsor
2 years ago

Yesterday, a Trump appointed judge, on the bench since, September 16, 2020, ruled at the gun grabber law is very likely unconstitutional, and gives an injunction.

Biden judge on the bench for 60 days, appointed on February 24, 2023, decided last week, that the law in its entirety, was constitutional, and denied to issue injunction.

I have my opinions if the law is constitutional or not, but these days, justice depends entirely on which president appointed your federal court judge.

Trash Panda
2 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

The four corners rule of the Constitution does not matter to liberals and democrats and that is quite apparent. It is not a living document that changes based on the opinions of the so called educated ones.

Wolf Larsen
2 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

What do you think of the two JB bought and paid for judges on the Illinois Supreme Court? What will be their ruling on the Safe T Act?

debtsor
2 years ago
Reply to  Wolf Larsen

I think JB paid $$$ big money to help elect the two ultra-liberal crazy justices. They are absolutely both gun grabbers. I’ve seen, on other sites, multiple Facebook pictures of one of them appearing with gun grabbing groups. Their response to the motion to recuse in the gun grabber case, that an attack on them is an attack on the court, is very indicative of the level of corruption. I mean, the IL SC just had Ed Burke’s WIFE as the Chief Justice. She had insufficient legal acumen to be on the supreme court, much less chief justice, yet, here… Read more »

Joey Zamboni
2 years ago

The back door cash flow grift continues…

These bills are purposely written & proposed to elicit legal challenges…

Thus ensuring select law firms continued benefit of tax payer monies, some of which will be “donated” back to their (D) enablers…

The corruption cycle continues…

Sadly this is a global issue…

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE