Totaling the unsustainable tax increases and windfall revenue during Pritzker Administration – Wirepoints
May 25, 2026
No Comments
With $162 billion more from taxpayers, couldn’t you deliver a few bond upgrades, too
-- Connecting the dots between our economy, government and business --
Audio and summary 
A largely unasked question is becoming glaring: Is Illinois doing all it should to use artificial intelligence to make government cost less and work better? So far, the evidence says no.
That’s good, should keep them out of the hands of the criminals in chicago.
Instead of a system of checks and balances, we have a system of Pritzker’s checks for Illinois Supreme court imbalance.
“After one weekend in place, Easterbrook shelved McGlynn’s ruling, granting a request from Raoul to put the Illinois gun ban back in effect. He did so without giving the plaintiffs the opportunity to respond to Raoul’s petition, and in a manner the plaintiffs have pointed out likely violated federal appellate court procedural rules.” “Even though state law plays a role in determining the existence of property or liberty interests which are protected by the Due Process Clause, whether a property interest is protected for purposes of substantive due process is a question that is not answered by reference to state… Read more »
I’m hoping there is something they know that we don’t.
Like the whole thing is a big sting operation to throw all the traitors in jail? 🙂
Big sting to throw traitors in jail? This fed poasting? No, like are signaling to the 7th Circuit behind the scenes that they expect the 7th Circuit to follow the precedent of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. That way they don’t need to step in to invalidate the law because they expect the 7th Circuit to do it. The 7th Circuit wouldn’t intervene at first, probably, because they want a brief and opinioning overruling the previous 7th circuit law upholding these laws (the deerfield assault weapons ban). The 7th circuit doesn’t usually overturn its own… Read more »
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241
test