By: Mark Glennon*
When was the last time you heard of a media outlet firing one of its top people for political bias – left-leaning bias, that is?
I can think of no recent examples, but that’s evidently at the heart of why WTTW, Chicago’s PBS affiliate, gave News Director Hugo Balta the ax.
But Balta is now crying foul and wrapping himself in the cloak of victimhood and social injustice.
Balta had been the subject of complaints from other employees about his use of Twitter and Facebook to express political views and “support for liberal candidates and causes,” according to media reporter Robert Feder.” Staffers feared some of his posts could harm WTTW’s reputation for credibility and integrity, wrote Feder. Others reporting Balta’s firing include the Chicago Tribune, Current and Media Moves.
WTTW maintains a policy prohibiting certain staff from identifying with political causes, candidates and organizations, which WTTW apparently believes he ran afoul of.
WTTW told Current, “As recently as this past weekend, Balta was listed as publisher and executive editor, owner and leader, and Head of Content on Latino News Network websites. He did not disclose to WTTW management that he still held these roles.”
Other specifics of Balta’s conduct are reported in Current. For example, Balta authored this 2020 op-ed for CTLatinoNews.com that’s partisan.
Complaints also were reported based on inappropriate social media posts, reportedly including a video of Balta doing bare-chested push-ups and a video of him dancing in his boxer shorts like Tom Cruise did in “Risky Business.”
But WTTW did not specifically mention social media in its statement to the Tribune about Balta’s exit, which includes the following: “This is the result of his undisclosed conflicts of interest related to his operational and editorial roles at other media outlets, which violated the terms of his employment. In addition, he repeatedly violated the WTTW News Standards he committed to uphold and which govern the newsroom he headed.”
Particularly notable is that WTTW is hardly a conservative outlet. It leans decidedly left, probably thanks, at least during his tenure, to Balta’s oversight.
Those complaining about Balta included three familiar faces familiar to many of you, the “Chicago Tonight” show’s Phil Ponce, Brandis Friedman and Paris Schutz, who sent a letter of complaint recently to WTTW’s CEO, according to Feder.
Salute to them.
Balta says he did nothing wrong and says he refused a severance package that would have required his silence. “I’m very proud of the work that I’ve been able to lead, collaborate and personally do in the last year,” Balta told the Tribune. “I think I was wrongfully terminated, and I think there’s a lot of misinformation that was leaked to Robert Feder….”

Just as you’d expect, he’s claiming persecution.
A statement he provided to Media Moves includes this:
After a year of high-impact news coverage and a clear focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion, the intolerance I’ve encountered over the last seven days saddens me and has inevitably led to my separation from WTTW.
I can only hope that at such a critical time due to COVID-19, racial reckoning following the death of George Floyd, and divisive presidential election – I have been able to lead the news team in shedding light on the inequities plaguing Chicago’s diverse communities and bring much-needed fair and accurate coverage by a local newsroom.
He told the Chicago Tribune, “This is about the silencing of raising voices and giving visibility to communities that have historically been miscategorized in news coverage, especially in legacy media. This is about looking to curb a journalist, the platform that I oversaw, to speak truth to power.”[Emphasis added.]
Maybe Balta thinks we haven’t noticed who is in power now.
And Balta said this in a statement to Feder: “Throughout my career, I have vocalized my commitment to a mission of transparency over the antiquated practices of objectivity.”
That, in a nutshell, is post-truth journalism that has become so common.
He was earlier at MSNBC and was a member of the NBC/MSNBC editorial board, which shouldn’t surprise you.
*Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints.
UPDATE 2/25/21: Huge Balta today has this response to his termination printed in the Chicago Sun-Times:
As a journalist, I have pursued a commitment to transparency over the antiquated practices of objectivity throughout my career. I have done everything in my power to combat inadequacy in representation and systemic racism, which often cripple newsrooms.
When WTTW hired me a year ago, the television station knew of my mission and beliefs as a journalist, as a proud Latino and a passionate advocate for diversity, equity and inclusion. Working in the public eye made me an attractive candidate and, ultimately, news director at WTTW. Sandra Micek, the station’s CEO and president, wanted to change the news department’s culture and hired an experienced, successful change agent to accomplish that goal.
A year’s worth of celebrated transformative initiatives is a testament to the success of an unconventional approach. Among them were the “In Your Neighborhood” series covering COVID-19 and the launching of “Chicago Tonight: Latino Voices” and “Chicago Tonight: Black Voices.”
It is clear to me now that WTTW leadership and veterans were not ready for real change nor impact.
I was wrongfully terminated last week because I don’t hide behind the handicap of objectivity as if journalists can check their humanity at the door. I subscribe to transparency in the pursuit of truth. By acknowledging my own biases, I surround myself with people who don’t often share the same experience, background and ideologies. It is by engaging with them in discourse about story coverage, those who tell the stories, and those who have the chance to be heard that we ensure fair and accurate coverage.
In an interview with Sun-Times columnist Laura Washington, Phil Ponce, longtime host of “Chicago Tonight” defended journalistic objectivity. “Objectivity is, you know, it’s at the core of ‘Chicago Tonight’s’ DNA,” he said. “If we become partisan and political, or people think we are, I mean, at that point, we’ve lost our credibility and relevance.”
Objectivity proposes that there are two sides to every story. But in fact, there are many perspectives, and the ones most often left out are from marginalized communities whose representation is absent from newsrooms.
It is objectivity that dilutes the coverage of systemic racism in government, health care, education, employment, victimizing communities that are not looking for handouts to survive but a fair chance to thrive.
Ponce sent posts from my personal Instagram account to WTTW’s news department that he deemed as “overtly political.” Among them was a post celebrating Kamala Harris on Inauguration Day.
Kamala Harris. The first woman to be elected vice president. The first woman of color to be elected vice president.
That post was not political; it was about a historic moment.
Laura Washington wrote: “Like every legacy news operation, it (WTTW) can always do more to cover and reflect communities of color.”
But how long do people of color have to wait?
For decades, these communities have demanded fair treatment from homogeneous leaders in the media, which all too often shape the prejudiced negative narrative that the general population considers truth. And what Ms. Washington described as creative and potent in this past year’s storytelling at WTTW was a deliberate strategy demonstrating the benefits of building a newsroom on a foundation of diversity and inclusion.
As journalists, transparency — not objectivity — delivers news and information empowering viewers, readers, and listeners.
Hugo Balta, Chicago
Expect no retraction or apology. This what they do.
The state’s existing buyout program for its own pensions is the precedent for Chicago, which should be a warning: Look out for similar exaggerated claims and shoddy analysis.
I recently wrote a letter to my Chicago PBS station manager in response to a request for my continued membership and support. In that letter I told her to loose my contact info and never write again because I was sick and tired of their biased reporting, particularly on FRONTLINE. I accused her station of being the propaganda arm of the DNC. My only hope is my letter played some small part in getting this left wing hack “cancelled.”
“Antiquated objectivity” includes the constant use of “anonymous sources” and thus causes a belief in fake news. Two anonymous sources told the NYT that that Capitol policemen died from being struck with a fire extinguisher. That story lived for two weeks and was cited in the impeachment. Yet, there is no video, no witnesses, no autopsy report, and no charges.
That is what a lack of objectivity in the pursuit of an agenda can cause. Maybe it’s “antiquated” to the Facebook/Twitter generation but not what most of us expect from journalism.
Yes +1,000 to this comment. Nearly all fake news originating from the main stream media uses ‘anonymous sources’ and ‘sources familiar’ with the story. This form of reporting is called ‘access journalism’. The reporter isn’t investigating anything or ferreting out a story; the reporter is instead relying on someone to give them information to feed into the narrative. The facts are never questioned in the article and reported as if they are true. But there’s really no way to know if it is true or not, and sometimes, those sources are fictions that exist solely in the journalist’s imagination. The… Read more »
The faction of the dems that are currently in charge of the white house do not want the left leaning socialist garbage being perpetuated. Keep in mind the dem party is now the party of billionaires which means they will placate the minorities that they own with token gestures but nothing real. If anyone steps out of line they must be removed. The Bernies / antifas / occupy wallstreeters must be brought to heel. More racebait less occupy wallstreet.
Any journalist who thinks objectivity is “antiquated” should be banned from any respectable newsroom.
Ooh. I missed that. Shame on me. And you are right that he should have no place in journalism. I have updated the article to add that. Thanks.
My understanding is that journalism school doesn’t really teach objectivity, they teach activism. I don’t think he means that objectivity doesn’t exist. He means that the practice of objectivity in journalism is antiquated, because modern journalism is about activism. I was discussing with my spouse last night channel 7’s news coverage about covid. We reached 500,000 deaths, with 100,000 coming in the last month, the deadliest month ever, completely and entirely on *Biden’s watch, due to his failures to ramp up vaccine production and distribution from Trump’s 1,000,000 vaccinations a day. Yet the story last night on Channel 7 basically… Read more »
I totally agree with your premise…
And I’m not calling you a liar…
But I just don’t believe for a second that 100K people died of covid in the last month…
I don’t believe the 500K number either…
Just more gaslighting by the CDC-medical experts…
Yep,i agree joey,all a bunch of over blown b.s!!!
That sentence and the full text of Balta’s statement is in a different Feder post on 2/17:
https://www.robertfeder.com/2021/02/17/wttw-fires-news-director-hugo-balta-staff-erupts-social-media/
Great article Mark ! WTTW News Director and he darn well KNEW that sharing his political opinion was prohibited. The op-ed you linked to was one week before the election and he seemed careful not to favor T or B. But then he wrote this: “The Biden campaign must have consistent and sincere communication with Latinos, especially between the ages of 18-29. Connecting, reminding, and sharing aloud gives a chance to afford change and spark imagination. This is the active and diligent outreach it takes to mobilize our communities. Whereas Donald Trump has done little in his four years in office… Read more »
As a kid (65) we all remember WTTW as being the educational station, the window to the world. When your black and white TV got to that channel the noise and antics of the other 4 only other stations disappeared. Channel “11” was quiet and refined, you learned something, but we kids avoided it favoring the three stooges or bewitched reruns. Now WTTW is a left wing propaganda arm, a damn shame that such an oasis on the dial has dried up.
Wttw-chicago tonight is so far left that 1/2 the time they have a pols group forum on a topic they can’t even get any Republicans to show up. And the rest of public tv has become 24/7– sjw/wokesterism stuff. And Im sure thier audience’s is largely white upperincome income lakefront liberal types that go for all that guilt shaming stuff
That’s why the old joke was “WTTW stands for Wilmette Talking To Winnetka.”
Great. I hope they find a person that will be objective. It certainly will make a difference locally in Chicago
I can’t stop laughing 😂😂😂
“to lead the news team in shedding light on the inequities plaguing Chicago’s diverse communities and bring much-needed fair and accurate coverage”
Too many reporters think this is their job, not objectively reporting the 5 W’s
How dumb are you if you have to have someone tell you how to think?
This. It is their job to report the news, not editorialize news. In the last 10-12 years it evolved to this. Right around when Obama took office.
In case you haven’t noticed, nobody wants objective or even news critical of their own side. they want to be spoon fed good news about their tribe, and bad news about the other tribe. NYT has more subscriptions than ever before and Fox News, at least until recently, had more viewers than at any point in its history. We live in a liberal town and journalism is liberal here. The result is now that liberal have a near stranglehold on the news, they feed you fake news and false reporting. That’s OK, that’s what people want. The real problem though… Read more »
News reporting has become less & less *objective* & more & more *subjective*…
No longer trusting us to understand the *facts*, they feel the need to *newsplain* to us…
I would love to know what really happened here. Outfits like WTTW want guys like Balta to hold the biases they have – it is why they are hired. I think back to Dan Rather – the network engaged Dick Thornburgh to represent them and to paint Rather and his pal Mapes as bad actors who acted outside the scope of their employment. Nothing could have been further from the truth. Rather and Mapes were doing what their bosses wanted. Their mistake was in getting caught, especially in a matter of minutes by Internet sleuths. I would like to know… Read more »
My guess is that he was a PITA to work with. A lot these journalist types are huge jerks, completely insane, self-absorbed and clueless to their surroundings. They act in ways that would never be tolerated in the real corporate world outside of the most leftist of industries like media, academia,internet co’s. nearly all the high profile #metoo stories occurred in a handful of industries. That crap wouldn’t be tolerated by the HR dept., even for a split second, no matter how powerful the person is the normal 9-5 corporate world.