15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rick
8 years ago

Bankruptcy will never happen until the bond market loses confidence. As long as investors know the politicians will side with them instead of taxpayers. And know in confidence that the taxpayers are a solid collateral for their risk. This train will keep rolling. We are living on usary, when that stops only then will bankruptcy be considered. The powers that be represent the bond market now, not us.

Mickey
8 years ago

first, who bought Illinois bonds and why. The interest rate does not come close to matching the risk. Second, at this point the best strategy to get things done is for the State to pay bills just to the limit of its cash flow meaning 3 to 6 billion of bills do not get paid whether its pensions, roads, social programs, education, welfare, and perhaps interest. Make it real crisis. But then we need a legislature up to something like this. I am tired of legislators pointing the finger at Madigan after their own failure to effect change. If the… Read more »

Ron Sandack
8 years ago

The reality? Most of the members of the legislature are as ignorant as the various Op-Ed Boards, some intentionally, about the pensions crisis, retiree health care crisis and, cumulatively, the financial crisis affecting. IL. So what to do? Pass a law mandating IL children be taught to write in cursive.

8 years ago

I don’t know what Rauner thinks the federal government can do about the state constitution.

If they try to allow for bankruptcy for states, there will be a constitutional battle royale all the way to the Supreme Court.

If Rauner wants this stuff taken care of, then: the Illinois state constitution needs to be amended. The federal govt can’t do that for him.

J.A.Herzrent
8 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

Could Congress clarify Chapter 9 to permit retirement systems to file for bankruptcy alongside the state or municipality that sponsors those systems? The systems are for some purposes treated as political subdivisions independent of the sponsor but they have certain presumed contractual claims against the sponsor. Then perhaps the court could modify both the systems’ contracts with their members (providing appropriate haircuts to pension millionaires) as well as bring the municipality’s obligations into line with what can be afforded while also maintaining necessary services. While it has jurisdiction, the court could also modify union contracts. While Republicans control the government,… Read more »

CSLS
8 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

should also add that the supremacy clause in the US constitution would allow for federal law to trump state law.

8 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

I am not a lawyer, much less a constitutional one, but it seems to me there would be plenty of federal litigation should the U.S. Congress try this play as well.

If it doesn’t work in state constitution amendment, I don’t see it working via federal law.

The only plus is if it’s going to take years of litigation up to SCOTUS level, may as well have it determined for all states and not just Illinois.

Anyway, yes, I’m blogging this later tonight.

Mr. Common Sense
8 years ago
Reply to  meep

Bankruptcy is the only rational answer to save Illinois.
Federal judges are not bound to a State Constitution.

Mr. Common Sense
8 years ago

Congress would have to pass legislation allowing States to file bankruptcy, thereby reforming those ridiculous and obscene lottery sized pensions.

Doug
8 years ago
Reply to  Mark Glennon

” The public across the country will eventually understand that not allowing bankruptcy for broke states like Illinois is costing them dearly”

Seems like the border states (migration destination states/ or states capturing growth) will benefit more than by keeping Illinois away from BK. The remaining states should eventually understand.

nixit
8 years ago

Rauner should be joining all the other governors with pension crises in Washington. The all-powerful Durbin should be working on this as well. It’s absurd for SJR to suggest we should not go to Washington for help. And SJR needs to figure out the difference between bi-partisan and capitulation. You know what a bi-partisan solution to RTW would be? Let local jurisdictions create temporary RTW zones to try out the idea on a small scale. If it works, keep going, if not, scrap it. In other words, what was attempted a couple years ago. That’s meeting in the middle, not… Read more »

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE