By: Mark Glennon*
This sure is enlightening. Check out the priorities of new leaders in Chicago’s City Council.
Illinois Answers Project spoke with the eight aldermen who were elected to second terms this year and are now leading committees for the first time. That project is part of Chicago’s Better Government Association, and the aldermen’s stated priorities appear in this illuminating, two-part column.
Surely, ideas to address crime, failing schools, broke pensions and taxes are among the priorities mentioned most often, right?
No, not a single mention of any of that by any of them. Those words or any synonym for them barely appear in any of their answers on priorities. The sole exception is on schools from Ald. Jeanette Taylor who chairs the Committee on Education and Child Development. But all she offered was about education transparency — more meetings and data. “It’s about being transparent and honest, and saying what we can and cannot do to reimagine education for everybody.”
Nor is there a single mention of an ideas to make Chicago more friendly toward employers.
And for the problems they do want to address, there’s almost no substance in their answers. Calls for more meetings, “conversations” and the like were most frequently among their priorities by far.
Here’s some of what they did list as priorities:
Ald. Maria Hadden, Committee on Environmental Protection and Energy, says “the role of my committee will be facilitating a space to have those conversations” about creating a Department of Environment. “And also, we cannot keep poisoning our constituents.”
Ald. Andre Vasquez, Committee on Immigrant and Refugee Rights, wants to focus on hosting regular hearings with updates on the city’s response to its migrant crisis, and “We need to be talking about how we’re going to get long-term revenue streams” for migrants,” he says.
Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez, Committee on Housing and Real Estate, wants more housing assistance, foreclosure relief and “we need to have a conversation about [tax-increment financing] and how the TIF program must be funding more housing initiatives in our communities,” he said.
Ald. Jeanette Taylor, Committee on Education and Child Development, plans this summer to host a series of subject matter hearings. “I want to do evening meetings at different city colleges and different schools,” she says, “just so that people can get used to government actually working for them and being part of their community.”
Ald. Daniel La Spata, Committee on Pedestrian and Traffic Safety, said “I definitely want to help [the Chicago Department of Transportation] in exploring and expanding their automated [bike lane blocking] enforcement pilot in the downtown area. And then there are ideas that have not yet been shaped into ordinances, like the Bike Grid Now campaign, and thinking about how that can go from a great idea to something that we’ve actually operationalized.”
Ald. Michael Rodriguez, Committee on Workforce Development, said the committee needs to keep pressing forward to advance labor rights in Chicago. “We’re looking at getting away from ‘sick’ and having it cover paid time off, potentially by looking at hours that workers can accumulate to earn time off. We want to right-size it to today’s economy, expanding workers’ rights,” he said. “Out the gate, I’m prioritizing paid leave and a rideshare ordinance to make life better for Uber and Lyft drivers.”
Ald. Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez, Committee on Health and Human Relations, wants to prioritize an ordinance she apparently hasn’t figured out yet. “My main issue is [the] Treatment Not Trauma [ordinance proposal], which is a comprehensive piece of legislation that is going to take some time to figure out, so it will probably be done in phases and take a lot of research and negotiations. We’re going to need multiple hearings to hear from experts and talk about best practices,” she said. “There’s a lot of other [proposals] we’re hopeful that we’ll be able to discuss, like Peace Book, public bathrooms, Indigenous People’s Day…,” she added.
Oh, and she wants “to have more frequent meetings, for sure.”
Ald. Matt Martin, Committee on Ethics and Government Oversight, was the exception who offered some substance, listing three matters he’d like to address: creating regular subject matter hearings about inspector general reports, changes to the city’s lobbying regulations involving nonprofits and legislation for publicly financed elections. He also wants quicker inspector general appointments to avoid vacancies.
In fairness, many of the problems the aldermen mentioned are real and their answers focused on their own committees’ missions, but surely their priorities should reflect the overriding problems that have crippled the city, like crime, failing schools, broke pensions and taxes.
*Mark Glennon is founder of Wirepoints.
Audio and summary
If this bill passes, say goodbye to local control over all Illinois parks and expect to see open drug and alcohol use, needles, no sanitation and fire hazards, but no ordinary park users.
So the long and short of it is that they will take up space, rubber stamp whatever BJ puts forth, and collect a check.
More ways to spend money…what could go wrong?
How to say “ we’re going to sit around blowing hot and cold without actually accomplishing anything “ without saying so. Artful, very artful.
Alderpersons interviewed all seem to operate on premise that there’s bottomless source of cash. Chicago is near bankruptcy, yet that seems irrelevant to Mayor Johnson and his 50 alder-elves.
The writing is on the wall folks.
Will you see?
Well, when the average IQ of these folks is likely at, or below, average, what does one expect?
Here’s how these “leaders'” comments could be interpreted: Ald. Maria Hadden: “. . . the role of my committee is as an admin assistant to facilitate conference rooms for conversations . . .” Ald. Andre Vasquez: “. . . how we’re going to get long term revenue streams for our homeless and veterans; wait, no, our migrants.” Ald. Jeanette Taylor: “. . . so that people can [somehow] get used to government actually working for them . . .” (someone finally recognizing how poorly the city serves its citizens). Ald. Daniel La Spata: Bike fines can be a more robust… Read more »
>>Calls for more meetings, “conversations” and the like were most frequently among their priorities by far.<<
Ah yes, the government bureaucrats dream – ‘meetings’ & ‘conversations’, with no actual expectations of any resolutions to problems…
It’s all smoke & mirrors to give the ‘impression’ that work is being done…
>>facilitating a space to have those conversations”<<
Straight out of the VP KH’s handbook on public speaking…
Getting mayor to asign you an aldermanic committee head has always been an aldermanic pirk where you get $100s of g’s to spend w zero oversight. Lightweight on Fergusons advice tried to get spending disclosure oversight ordinance passed but failed. So, there’s ZERO incentive to do anything substantive or even meet with these committees.
Seem to recall hearing that a “ covid response team “ split 385k between three staffers that had maybe one meeting. Good ole Chicago/ Illinois way!
There is enough substance in their priorities to put into a thimble, and still have enough room left over for it to roll around.
Ald. Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez, Committee on Health and Human Relations, wants to prioritize an ordinance she apparently hasn’t figured out yet. “My main issue is [the] Treatment Not Trauma [ordinance proposal], which is a comprehensive piece of legislation that is going to take some time to figure out, so it will probably be done in phases and take a lot of research and negotiations. We’re going to need multiple hearings to hear from experts and talk about best practices,” she said. “There’s a lot of other [proposals] we’re hopeful that we’ll be able to discuss, like Peace Book, public bathrooms, Indigenous… Read more »
It appears to all be about increasing the size of city government and thus patronage jobs for the connected. Status quo with updated bloviating to be ‘woke’. None of these people appear to be interested in putting their ‘shoulder to the wheel’ and solving the long-term problems of the city.
They don’t have the resources to successfully execute on their plan. I don’t think it’s a matter of money either, rather one of skillset and work ethic. Chicago can open up as many mental health clinics as they want, but who’s going to staff them? Unless you hire a bunch of mental healthcare wannabee grads from NEIU who will be in way over their heads.
This is going to be an administration of slogans and PowerPoint presentations with very little real world progress.
Lightfoot took us to the edge, Johnson will take us to the abyss. It’s going to be painful and needs to be before the Citizens will wake up.
Preckwinkle is the true puppet master in Illinois now as head of the Democratic party of Cook County. She is the one that you really need to watch.
Watch for what!?
The direction the city and state are headed and what will or will not pass. Talk with anyone who does “business” with the city/county/state and ask where their donations go. She is intelligent and stays out of the spotlight but quietly has input into everything.
She is Madigan 2.0 . . . with the cunning and deception he had and more. Why would she consider another run for mayor with the throne she’s created for herself?
She’s 74 years old or something she could stroke out or go full dementia at some point in the near future. She certainly has power, but she’s just a reflection of the changing demographics of the city and cook county. The conservatives have mostly left and moved away, outside of small pockets scattered through the metropolian area. The Northwest suburbs used to be called the Panhandle of Dupage County because it was so conservative. No one calls it that anymore and Arlington Heights voted Biden +25. If 25 years ago, you asked me if Arlington Heights would be filled with… Read more »
With the equivalent of an Elgin or Joliet departing every year, eventually the historically conservative bastions are being converted. The DuPage County board chair is a Democrat. That was unthinkable just a few years ago. The implosion is underway and I’ll be watching from the freedom sideline – Indiana.
Well the Leftists will get to enjoy that which they have voted for I guess.
Leftists don’t enjoy what they voted for. After they’ve destroyed where they live, they eventually move to well run red states and they bring their liberal politics with them too…
Watch for her to pick another State’s Attorney.
Regarding reopening city mental health centers, they’re not going to be staffed with licensed Phycitrsts or psychologists or be able to prescribe antidepressants or mental health medications? I assume all that will be by CC health or contract providers as it is now. All reopening mental health centers is about is satisfying SEIU and providing false hope at astronomical costs
The dirty secret about mental health is that the industry has barely evolved past lobotomies. Today’s treatment for nearly all mental health issues is a cocktail of psychotropic drugs, that either incapacitates the patient (who complain about dulling their senses) or, in the case of SSRI’s, turns a small number of them, especially those that consume marijuana regularly, into violent mass shooters. And it’s near impossible to get really mentally ill people to regularly take their medicine so I’m not sure how mental health clinics will solve anything. Most of these people are unable to hold regular jobs, and therefore… Read more »
All it takes to be a “mental health provider” is a two-year master degree from any mediocre university offering program, no GRE, no prior BA degree in related major required. It’s easy 2nd-career degree. MSSW grads aren’t equipped to deal w/psychotic folks, or 911 situations, but that’s who gets job.