Chicago aldermen propose $33 per employee ‘head tax’ on city employers – Illinois Policy

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rick
7 years ago

its called a shake down. But at least when the mafia is collecting you get some protection and muscle for your fee. What do these businesses get in return for this payment?

bob oriole park
7 years ago
Reply to  Rick

Well, they get motivated to only have 49 employees. They get motivated to relocated outside the city limits if they start to build the business.

nixit
7 years ago

A friendly reminder that the previous Employer Expense Tax (Head Tax) exempted not-for-profit and educational organizations, meaning CTU was exempt from paying it. I’m guessing this iteration is no different. This twist of exempting employees from specific neighborhoods is a pending administrative nightmare. How would a McDonald’s franchise be treated? Is a single franchise restaurant exempt if it employs less than 50 people or subject to the tax as they are all McDonald’s employees? Then again, I’d wager many of those employees would come from these exempt neighborhoods, which raises the question why a large multi-national corp offering minimum wage… Read more »

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check all you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Don’t forget the same lawmakers who are ‘defending’ Chicago’s selective enrollment schools also ended school choice – Wirepoints on AM 560 Chicago’s Morning Answer

Ted joined Dan and Amy to talk about Chicago’s latest bond offering, why Chicago’s dismal home value growth is due to poor policies, the next $70 million to be spent on migrants, the 9% salary hikes demanded by the CTU, and why Illinois lawmakers voting to stop Chicago’s selective enrollment schools from being closed is hypocritical.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE