Chicago Mayor Introduces Major Reforms to Punitive Vehicle Impound Program – Reason

Last April, the Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law firm, filed a civil rights lawsuit against Chicago, alleging that the city's impound scheme violates the Illinois and U.S. Constitution's protections against excessive fines and unreasonable seizures, as well as due process protections.
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
debtsor
5 years ago

It’s about time. These stupid things make living in Chicago ridiculous.
But on the other hand, if you can reform the system to stop the outlying injustices, what about the rest of the cases? How do you make people pay a few hundred dollars in parking and red light tickets if CRUSHING THEIR VEHICLE FOR SCRAP isn’t enough? You can’t have your license suspended, now you can’t impound their vehicle, they won’t even use the state comptroller to collect them anymore. IS THERE ANY WAY TO MAKE PEOPLE PAY THEIR TICKETS FOR VIOLATING THE LAW?

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

Mark Glennon on AM560’s Morning Answer: Chicago pension buyout plan mostly shifts debt rather than eliminating it, property tax surge doubles inflation over three decades

Chicago’s political leadership is floating a pension buyout program as evidence it is seriously addressing the city’s thirty-six-billion-dollar unfunded pension liability, but Mark Glennon, founder of the Illinois policy research organization Wirepoints, said that the proposal moves debt from one column to another rather than reducing it, and that the broader fiscal picture facing the city continues to deteriorate across every measurable dimension. Audio here.

Read More »

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE