Kankakee County judge finds that elimination of cash bail provision in SAFE-T Act is unconstitutional – Chicago Tribune/MSN

State Reps. Will Guzzardi and Jehan Gordon-Booth celebrate after the House passed changes to the criminal justice law known as the SAFE-T Act, at the Illinois State Capitol on Dec. 1, 2022, in Springfield. The state will appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court, according to a statement from Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, and a statement from Gov. JB Pritzker's office late Wednesday called the ruling “a setback for the principles we fought to protect through the passage of the SAFE-T Act...The General Assembly and advocates worked to replace an antiquated criminal justice system with a system rooted in equity and fairness."
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Boomer
3 years ago

From CWBCHICAGO.COM. That get out of jail free thing really works. Before that, according to IDOC, Browning went to prison for: 5 years for theft from a school or church in 2019 8 years for burglary in 2017 another 8 years for burglary in 2017 three more 8-year sentences for burglary in 2017 3 years for theft by deception in 2017 2 years for theft in 2016 two 2-year sentences for theft by deception in 2016 1 year for possession of a controlled substance in 2016 10 years for aiding or abetting possession of a stolen motor vehicle in 2010… Read more »

Poor Taxpayer
3 years ago

No cash bail is for your SAFE-T?
A test of how stupid Illinois can be.
From the looks of it, pretty damn stupid.

Lana
3 years ago

Illinois is not only a sanctuary state for illegals, it is a becoming a sanctuary state for criminals. Such as the way many Democrat governed states are going or will be going.

Ex Illini
3 years ago

This is terrible news for Kwame. He’ll actually need to do some work. He’s not used to that at all.

Fullbladder
3 years ago
Reply to  Ex Illini

As exemplified by the 2020 riots, and ANY action in Chicago to stem the violence. I’m going to have shirts made up “Where’s Kwame”.

Riverbender
3 years ago

The bill was put in to satisfy assorted groups after the Floyd shooting. I was and am hoping that the provision holds up just as written so when implemented the people will see the reality of the ideas certain individual groups want for this State so in order to evaluate future requests from these organizations.
It’s for educational purposes and certainly no one wants to deny an education to the Illinois citizenry.

debtsor
3 years ago
Reply to  Riverbender

I’d rather not put my family and myself at risk of death or injury just to ‘own’ some libs who could care less. Crime will go up and they’ll just double down on wokeness and blame some other problem. Not one of these people ever look back and regret or admit the law was a bad idea. This is not just some generalization. This is quite frankly, the response every communist ideologue has ever had. There’s no such thing as a reformed communist. The communist cannot admit fault, its just not part of his religion.

Last edited 3 years ago by debtsor
Riverbender
3 years ago
Reply to  debtsor

I used to think your way until I finally woke up to the Illinois’ political system and how it operates. You and your family are already at considerable risk the way the system is now.

Don Peppe
3 years ago

that photo evokes such sympathy….lol

alfrmchgo
3 years ago

Revolvers, multiple revolvers…

Paul Boomer
3 years ago

Most of the bill has been upheld and the cash bail provision struck down but only applies to the 60 or so counties that were part of the lawsuit. Attorney General Raoul (insert laughter) will now appeal to Illinois Supreme Court, 5 democrats, 2 Republicans so we already know what the outcome will be. Meanwhile, Officer Smith, you forgot to activate your body cam as that guy was shooting at you so we are charging you with a felony and releasing the violent criminal that fired shots at you because of your felony crime.

debtsor
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul Boomer

The IL constitution says “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties” and then lists some exceptions for felonies. If the Illinois Supreme Court overturns this lower courts decision, on a 5-2 partisan basis, then we no longer have any system of justice at all, where the court can disregard the obvious and plain language of the constitution itself, and all that matters is politics. Which of course would be on the one hand terrible, but on the otherhand, it means that the pension and contract clause obligations can be overturned in the future by a conservative court without a… Read more »

Paul Boomer
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul Boomer

To the down voters, 🖕

SIGN UP HERE FOR FREE WIREPOINTS DAILY NEWSLETTER

Home Page Signup
First
Last
Check what you would like to receive:

FOLLOW US

 

WIREPOINTS ORIGINAL STORIES

WE’RE A NONPROFIT AND YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE DEDUCTIBLE.

SEARCH ALL HISTORY

CONTACT / TERMS OF USE